Advait Tantra School WEBLOG

Heart Meditation

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Sun, 13 May 2012 12:10:00 +0000

Master Atisha said: As you breathe in, take in and accept all the sadness, pain, and negativity of the whole world, including yourself, and absorb it into your heart. As you breathe out, pour out all your joy and bliss; bless the whole of existence.

This technique was taught a thousand years ago by Master Atisha, and the technique itself is possibly a lot older. It is perhaps the centre of the spiritual discipline known in Tibet as Loojong .

Master Atisha had a particular of spiritual intrest: Speed and efficiency. Atisha was all about the most effective methods, most supportive attitudes and spiritual totality in general.

That's why his so concise description of this technique, quoted above, expresses the totality of this technique. The starting point, and the method were taught person to person. The text served as a reminder of the practice and a concise distillation of the full teaching.

This meditation is a key method for growing your heart centre and using it consciously. The core work of this school is the re-development of the Dakini's arts and practices, in ways appropriate to the world as it is now. This practice is one that we treasure as a glowing ember among the ashes of Ancient Tantra, which has contributed greatly to this school's fire, to the heart of this phoenix.

So, don't be daunted by Atisha's words, the scale of the aim he urges. If you're even just tasting, dabbling with the idea of Tantra perhaps being your path, just taste this, dabble with this too. Particularly if you get some knocks along with life's caresses.

Tantrikas often deliberately and consciously do things and make choices that they know could bring them hurt and suffering as well as joy and bliss. We know that truth is to be found just as much in our tears as in our laughter. Living with this approach means that Tantrikas are in for Strong Feelings, often mixed. Some of them quite destructive to the body if not handled quickly and thoroughly.

Heart meditation is a way to handle current hurt and to grow the heart's capacity to handle more. With some diligent practice at times of pain, suffering, and particularly heart-soreness, your heart's capacity increases beyond the requirements of your own suffering. What used to literally be "killing you" becomes "Heart Food".

Atisha was all packed for his Mission to Tibet when someone told him what lovely, mannered, natural and thoroughly people the Tibetans were and how lucky he was to be going there.

This information didn't please him at all. Quite the contrary. He solved his problem by arranging that a thoroughly unpleasant, mean-spirited fellow ( A Bengali chef) he knew join his Mission. Just making sure that he would have at least some "fuel" – some negative emotion, some hurt – available in his own body so that he could demonstrate the practice.

About the CD

On this CD, I guide you into this technique, supporting you to get the "knack" of it, to allow your opening to feeling your own hurt, and allowing your heart to transform your experience of that hurt. Sound Artist Gabriel added some smooth background tones, just to deepen the feeling of it.

The practice of Heart Meditation does not require High Ideals or a Great Spiritual Purpose. At a practical level, for most people, it's the most easing and supportive of practices for just getting through the tougher parts of life's journey. Good medicine. Just, it may carry the risk of you becoming a Seeker, maybe even a Tantrika … don't take that risk lightly.

Heart meditation CD (disc in box, posted) available at CreateSpace (an Amazon Company) for $11.95

Now also available as a download for only $7.00 via PayPal

Science vs Religion? Science is a religion.

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:29:00 +0000

Science is now a full fledged religion. Much of its proselytising has been based on its not being a 'religion' at all. Science claims to be a rational, logical approach to investigating existence.

The early scientists, like the early christians before them were persecuted. Their teachings were demonised and their morality was considered suspect. Over time, the new way gradually replaced the old.

As was the case with early christianity many priests of the new religion hold a dual allegiance, practicing the old forms while being involved with the new. As the numbers and confidence of the new religion grows, allegiance becomes an issue. Peoples and their governments are under increasing pressured to choose.

Science has heroes now. Hitchslap (now deceased) and Dawkins have been aggressively challenging priests in debate.

Over time, Christian priests became part of culture and government. Science has done very well in these areas.

People once went to priests for confession, shared prayer, emotional help and healing. Various branches (roughly equivalent to Catholic Orders) of science now perform these functions for many who still profess adherence to old religion. Even the Pope is treated by practitioners schooled in the ways of medical science.

Christian's views were sought (or had to be respected) when political decisions were made and when laws were written. Their practices and divinations were taken seriously in courts of law. A dream about the sexual conduct of, for example, a witch could result in a severe sentence even in the complete absence of any other supporting evidence. Nowadays, the pronouncements of scientists have more influence in such things than that of priests of the old religions.

When Christianity was the new religion, many people were much relieved that they could now just have a sip of wine and a piece of bread rather than get involved with real blood and entrails. It was also a relief to be assured that a new God (or representative thereof) had arisen – the old ones had not been heard from for so long that even their priests did not really believe in them anymore.

Nowadays, many are relieved that they do not have to go to a place of worship to avoid ostracism or worse from their community. They are glad to be free of priests, imams and preachers. They are glad to think they live in a well ordered, understandable universe and they are generally willing to be guided by those who claim to understand it in detail.

Science is obviously a great improvement on the Abrahamic religion. Its claim to not be a religion is a strong feature of its propaganda. Very believable. Much of science seems to be about investigating the truth of 'what is' rather than pronouncing dogmas and beliefs. Science claims to not have dogmas and beliefs. It claims to deal in facts.

It is said that one becomes what one opposes. Science has, for a while been opposing religion. Lately, it has been especially targeting the Bible Belt selective-literalists who dominate American elections and public policy.

I call Science a full-fledged religion now because it has all the major features of the religions and all of the attendant failings.

Mysticism is the department of religion that is its seed. The mystics attempt to understand, see, hear or become the divine. They take risks, gambling on intuitive leaps and their strength of faith. They provide a religion with a starting point, making pronouncements about and explanations of observable and invisible phenomena. The mystics of a religion express awe at the elegance of the underlying principles of existence that they find revealed to them. Because they are not much influenced by politics and financial interests they eventually become inconvenient to a religion. Mystics have been silenced, even by assassination, when their revelations have been inconvenient to the other departments of the religion.

Theology is the branch of a religion that argues and evolves ideas, understandings and teachings from the writings of the mystics. It continually re-examines its interpretations in the light of current social necessity and circumstances. It constrains itself with agreement on the sources and references it works from, and its statements are subject to, internal debate, scrutiny and peer review before being allowed serious consideration.

The Doctrinal branch declares the known certainties and the fundamental principles of the religion. It is the authoritative part of the religion. It tells the adherents what to believe. It is also the department that interfaces most with government, the law and other social institutions. Doctrine deals in the declaration of absolutes. It has little room for the debatable statements of theology and none at all for new revelations from the mystics.

The older, larger and more established a religion becomes, the more it avoids new mysticism, constrains theology and emphasises dogma.

Christianity has become increasingly vulnerable due to this trend. The dogmas that inform policy around sex, marriage and abortion and chosen death are obviously outdated and silly. Likewise the Bible Belt literalists' dogma of Intelligunt Desine and their protests about the teaching of the theory of evolution.

Science has developed a huge body of theology. It is based upon the work of the major Scientific mystics: Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. It declares dogmas, presenting them as 'facts' and declares unbelievers to be primitive, stupid or un-evolved.

Dogmas are, of course, not necessarily incorrect. When they are incorrect, though, it can prove impossible to replace or modify them. If mysticism is still strong in a religion, changes to dogma can happen, but very slowly, each order and sect taking its own time about things.

Dogma also severely affects the next generation of mystics and theologians. It provides boundaries to how they may think of their discoveries and interpretations. It prevents the publication and popularisation of ideas that call dogmas into question.

Evolution is an area of particular heat in the current challenge the new religion brings to the old. Personally I like the the mysticism of it. It is indeed an elegant insight into how some aspects of the arising existence we observe come to be the way they are. It is worth calling a theory - a possible explanation of what one of the processes of life might be.

A religion, though, cannot compete with vague ideas and suppositions as weapons of debate. It needs dogma. Science calls its dogmas 'proven theories'. Dawkins and his militant atheists have declared evolution to be an indisputable fact.

Being dogmatic about evolution, particularly human evolution is foolish. The entire fossil record of human developments is said to total under a half-ton. Neanderthals and the other early humans had skeletons within the parameters of current humanity. They were not as different from us as a rottweiler is from a maltese poodle or an Arabian thoroughbred from a cart horse.

Evolution and its mechanisms have mysteries. There are factors at play that have not been accounted for. The stance of dogma, of declaring a theory to be a fact, makes Science as silly as the religions it tries to ridicule.

As has been seen with Christianity, dogma encourages circuitous logic of a self supporting nature. It also makes firm declarations that the religion insists its laity and even non-adherents respect. The contradictions that arise between dogma and theology are settled, usually, by the insistence that theology respect dogma. When this does not work, a schism develops, as between Catholics and the breakaways that protested against its dogma: the Protestants.

Religions grow far beyond their original mystical/investigative parameters when they become involved with culture and law. In the area of law, the typically religious failings of science are occasionally seen.

Not long ago, a cluster of particular injuries was regarded by medical science as proof of "shaken baby syndrome". Proof that at least one of the parents had shaken the baby severely, thus contributing to its death. Proof worth going into court with. Proof good enough to get convictions with little or no further supporting evidence.

Recently, the same cluster of injuries was documented as being caused by falls and other accidents. Several convictions have since been overturned. This could be regarded as a good thing - science corrected the error it had made and some unlucky people are now free. It could be regarded as a bad thing if the scientific evidence of the presented dogma (in this case called a syndrome) meant that other evidence was not gathered, thereby enabling guilty people to now go free.

In America there was a laboratory where the police sent cartridge cases found at crime scenes. They also sent them boxes of bullets found in houses they searched. Definitive pronouncements, claiming to exactly match which box of bullets the rounds at a crime scene came from was key evidence in many trials. It was also, we now know, absolute thumb-sucking.

To even moderately developed logic, it seems absurd that judges and juries were gulled by such nonsense. They were fooled, many times, because an authoritative fellow told them, with sincerity, that their science revealed the truth to several decimal places of certainty.

Other dogmas in this area seem to be dying out more slowly.

DNA evidence being used to 'put' someone at the scene of a crime is just ridiculous. Several degrees of separation can still carry a trace of DNA. The DNA 'magnification' techniques claim to discern very small samples indeed … just a few skin cells in clothing, or something just briefly touched. I am sure DNA magnification could prove me to have been in around a dozen or so cities so far this year, just from the visits of people I have hugged, touched or shared a bath, a computer keyboard and so on with. If it is as sensitive as claimed, this science would probably find 'me' almost anywhere on the planet.

Partial finger prints, drug tests and other staples of law enforcement are equally and obviously dodgy, but have a scientist from the dogma department tell it, and people will respect belief as fact.

Scientists now give evidence as to the likelihood of recidivism. They make pronouncements about the future development of 'sex offenders', justifying serious ongoing persecution quite beyond the usual parameters of law. They give evidence about the social/psychological damage that children suffer if their parents are vegetarian or raw-food fans. In some cases they support the remove of children from such harmful parenting.

The dogmas and self-justifying logic at the roots of many branches of science are just as presumptive as those of any religion. Even discoveries that shake foundational premises do not prevent branches from ignoring them and carrying on under doctrinal protection. Education in particular suffers.

A few dogmas of science:

Archeology: The dating of the pyramids and the narrative given by the early saints (Carter et al) stand. Even if the geologists point out some rather extreme inconsistencies.

The constancy of the speed of light and other laws of science: These things may be universal, but even if they are, it is a matter of assumption. WE can see how things look from here, but we can only really know about 'out there' when we get out there. The further assumptions that lead to the theories explaining red-shift and other pillars of current cosmology do have other possible explanations. The descriptions and suppositions about the 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' which have become necessary to make the numbers work are as esoteric and as strange as anything that other theologians have come up with.

Talking of numbers, one of the greatest browbeating weapons the new priests wield is the club of statistics. Nothing gets people to shut up like a firmly pronounced augury.

Here is a little statistical game which may make this point:

Let us suppose that a disease affects a few in a population that you are part of. Say on average, 3 out of 1000 people have the disease.

Let us say the disease has no particular identifying symptoms, and you are tested to see if you have it.

Let us say that the test you are given is claimed by the scientists to be 90% accurate, and you test positive.

The question is: What are the odds that you have the disease?

To most people and most scientists, the answer is obvious. The test is 90% accurate, so there is a 90% chance that you have the disease.

But, let's get a bit deeper into those numbers. If 1000 people are tested with a test that is 90% accurate, 100 false-positive results are expected.

If 3 people out of 1000 have the disease, 103 positive results are expected.

If you test positive, the actual chance that you have the disease is therefore around 2%. A little different from 90%.

It has been said: There are lies, damned lies, and then there are statistics.

Personally, I am a fan of the mystics of science. I enjoy the logic games and suggestions of string theorists and Lisi. I also enjoy the practicalities of technology.

Technology is an interesting branch of science, sometimes being developed from insights and theory, but usually having to meet the test of reality in application. The technological areas of science are less prone to dogma, but it does occur.

The dogma of technology is largely determined by financial interests. This is why we still drive petroleum fueled vehicles with infernal combustion engines instead of ones running on electricity. The prevailing technological dogma is that the technology for electric cars is 'not yet developed'.

I do think that, in the main, the new religion is potentially more human friendly and useful than the older ones. Maybe … if we can see it for what it is, support its mystics and take the dogmatics with a pinch of salt.

Self Love

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 06:46:00 +0000

As I mentioned to someone earlier today in a flurry of theoretical confidence, self love is a cornerstone of tantric practice. Under instruction from The Swami, I was to go off and explore one of my eroticisms which he felt I have dabbled with (a great deal), but apparently not yet "immersed myself in with sufficient totality to get the juice of it" or some such tantra-esoteric phrasing.

Faun and Nymph, 1868

by Pal Merse Szinyei

Obediently taking myself in hand, I soon discovered that today it was bland and boring. Visions of being ravished by the deity, Pan, was not working the magic it had previously. Some inner personality was pouting, remembering the recent very real ravishing it had had and objecting to my own touch which felt a lot less interesting. No yumminess, no juice, not a twitch of kundalini shudder that I’ve been happily acquainted with of late. Nothing. Erotic flat-lining…

I felt like I’d failed my tantrika test. The teaching goes that in order to really love another, we must be able to love ourselves first – how can you expect someone else to do for you what you are not willing to do for yourself…kind of thing.

So here I am, setting out on my journey to teach this stuff and I can’t even raise a flicker of heat on my own.

Despondent, miserable and restless, I remembered a story from Dakini Shakti about the first time she felt kundalini orgasm sitting on a rock in a river, and decided a beach walk was long overdue anyway.

From the moment I stepped outside, my old friend and beloved Nature god, Pan was ravishing oblivious me with all his might. The south ester Howled around me and sand blasted into every available crevice. I found a rock to shelter next to and watch the sun set. Ozoneated air filled my lungs and fine sea spray reached my face in gusts. The warm, lichen covered rock felt friendly behind me. I lay back in a little spot just perfect for my body and dived inward to see what was up.

I invite the warm rock energy up into my feet, to stream along my body and out through my head. Not much happening... I try pulling it and pushing it and have visions of a stubborn donkey. Nothing… nothing… nothing… I surrender. I remember that even numbness is a feeling. I invite it in, breathing it into my heart.

And then, the slightest glimmer. It’s not the fountain-like feeling I felt before, though. It’s like… sheet lightning. No particular source, no particular direction or end. It flickers, electric, throughout my body- Subtle, very very subtle, but exquisite and sweet, like the faint smell of jasmine from far away

The sun sets and I snuggle with my beloved rock. After a while the cool wind ushers me home.

So, today I learnt this:

~Self love does not mean self abuse :-). Whether its mechanical sex or mechanical masturbation – touch that is imposed on the body out of an idea of what should happen, has about as much artfulness as 16 year olds with only porno and peers for guidance on what to do with each others' bodies. I was not listening to what my body really wanted in order to feel loved: A walk in the elements.

~ Again, the truth behind one of the Schools many axioms; “It’s never what you expect”

~ Rocks are more engaging than they appear to be and

~ Pan likes to do his ravishing outdoors.

Childhood Insights from Alia

noreply@blogger.com (Dakini Crystal) — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:25:00 +0000

Rahasya's daughter, Alia, shared this piece of writing with us last night.
It shows insight and she agreed to me sharing it here.

Sadistic Bastards

Why are children's story writers such sadistic bastards?

Wait, you doubt that statement?
Seriously? Have you never seen Bambi?
They make this beautiful fun world and just as you have completely fallen for it, want to live in it and be one of the characters in the story, they make disaster strike. They tear this new and beautiful world to shreds and are not satisfied until you cry. Then a few short happy moments later, just enough to stop the tears, and it's over.
But that happy ending isn't what lasts, it's the tragedy that sticks with you, especially at such a young age.

What do you learn from that? I don't know about you but it taught me that when there is joy, sorrow soon follows and shatters your world, then you have to rebuild it, and the cycle continues.
That is a pretty depressing outlook on the world.
Kids shouldn't have such things shoved down their throats; you only need to learn responsibility like that when you're a teenager.

I suppose the happy ending isn't as happy if there isn't some sorrow, but then put the sorrow near the beginning, like in the Lion King, before you have even met all the characters. That movie taught me that everything that happened in the past helped shape who I am now, and not to cling to or run from bad memories, but rather learn and grow from them. It also taught me that tragedies in life help you grow. If Mufasa hadn't died, Simba would never have met Timone and Pumba and never have become the lion that he did.

The point I'm trying to make is, rather teach children how to cope and grow from the potential troubles and tragedies in life, then tell them that tragedy is inevitable.

Wanting

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:16:00 +0000

How much of what I think of as my love is my wanting? How much wanting have I done in the name of love?

M Scott Peck says: "Real love is wanting the other person's good. Romantic love is wanting the other person."

For the last 2 or 3 years I have been deeply challenged in the realms of romantic rejection and watching the beloved love another.

Comparison, jealousy, feelings of deep deficiency and accompanying depression are well traversed territories in me.

"God, I am so sick of this! I WANT to be WANTED, DAMMIT!!!" I bang my hand on the steering wheel while tearing around mountain pass corners in my little bakkie. My teachers sit squashed on the bench seat next to me on our way back from dinner, taking in my emotive outburst and boisterous driving style with equal equanimous grace. "So your wanting is for a theoretical state in another's mind?", one says. "Look carefully and see if you can find any dharma in that".

The jealousy and hunger for love (not any kind of love, mind you: Very specific love in specific ways from specific people... in what my teacher refers to as Mind Symbols) makes me feel wild, and desperate like some kind of caged creature that is starving to death... and there is that in me which is dying, because it is time for it to die now.

But it doesn't go down without a fight. This desperate place in my unconscious is the spawning ground for all my manipulation, for my clutching onto beloveds, my pushing, my forcing, these insistences that arise from my mind, rather than from my being.

With guidance and the insistence of Existence, I am gradually learning to make space for the horrible states created by my thoughts- these deficient, heavy states.

I give up trying to get my external to rescue me from them - all that manoeuvring I have done in the name of Love to try to get others, particularly the beloved, to convince me that it's not true: This horrible self image I have. And I let myself go... into this frightening feeling, these mucky, sticky, heavy, murky depths.

Yes- I am worthless.

Yes- I am so small.

I lack.

I am so deeply deficient.

I am the loser.

I give up trying to fight these things.

My body becomes so heavy that I can't stay upright.

I slump down flat, sinking into the mud...

And then somehow in this surrender, this death, there is a calm. I find myself looking at the thoughts and the feelings with compassion... And find that I am not that.

In my heart there is value. I can see the value of my surrender, the value of that which has chosen this surrender.

Today a shoot breaks through the surface of the mud... gradually it climbs through the dark muddy water towards the light...

Painting by Stephanie Pui-Mun Law

Thank you dear Wendy and Rahasya for your loving guidance last week during our tantra practitioner training.

Elitism and the Lightning Path: A Discussion of the Rocky Horror Tantra Book

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:51:00 +0000

Following is a quote from the introduction to Rocky Horror Tantra (see previous blog post for more) and ensuing conversation/debate between Rahasya and Anne-Marie Clulow, a tantric practitioner.

Rahasya:

"The first task of any teacher of tantra is to scare you off the idea all together. This is a compassionate measure designed to spare those without the calling, saving them considerable effort, pain and time.

Tantra is also known as the Path of Bliss, the Lightning Path and the Royal Road.
Bliss, because pleasures and pains are embraced, not avoided. Bliss is the integration, the encompassing acceptance, of life’s pleasure and suffering as one suchness.
Lightning, because the path is notable for its extreme speed.
The Royal Road, because it is a path designed (at least the Buddhist version) originally for the elite of a culture, who’s worldly involvement and responsibilities make a monastic life impractical.

The personal characteristics that produce achievers in any area of human endeavour are essential to tantra: Ambition, determination, responsiveness and especially hubris."

Anne-Marie:
Hmmm. And scared off I would have been. And run I did. And hide. And fear. And then...
You cannot not do it.
You can send any challenge into the universe.
And you cannot not be it.
I am looking fwd to reading this book, as for so long my inner voice/guide/channel told me to learn through my own experience, not through those of others. That my learning had to be my own, that my path was unique. In my opinion I believe that true of everyone now, and I subscribed differently for a long time. Rahasya, I often do not agree with you, finding many things that you say elitist. Yet, I am so grateful to you. For what would any of this be if we were all in agreement? And what does Tantra teach if not acceptance of everything? Part of my path presently is truly listening to those I do not agree with. If I have gathered anything from your posts, it is that you would not be offended by this at all, that you enjoy a great debate, and that your views on many things do not subscribe to the norm?

And I had to look up hubris!! Hahaha!!!

Rahasya:
A lovely word, Anne-Marie, and it looks to me like you have at least your fair share of it :)

Elitist - absolutely!

Special forces soldiers consider themselves an elite among the military, although 'regular' soldiers could be offended by that idea.
Tantra is not something 'everyone can do'. It just is so. Just like not every enlisted man has the capacity for special forces work.
Acknowledging actual differences is not a superiority/inferiority thing though, any more than Inuit are 'superior' human beings because the handle cold that would kill other people.

Tantrikas often would not wish what they have to go through on anyone, even if they have a worst enemy.

Anne-Marie:
I agree with some of this, and disagree too. False dichotomy... As it is not an either or actually.
I agree that it would be easier to not have this calling which I have perceived through my experience as being a conduit to energy outside of myself as well as using my own sexual energy to specifically channel into another's body, enabling a body experience that leads to many things, emotional release, insight, visions, change in consciousness, increased sexual energy and heightened energy for actual physical healing too. I would have preferred to wear white and meditate a shitload like the Buddhists. Until I saw the hypocrisy of not being able to save a drowning woman because you can't touch a woman, yet completely missing the point of the original precepts of do not kill. Obviously, allowing to die was seen differently. I was
tired of splitting hairs. I wanted something that encompassed all, did not judge, did not deem itself "better than" I wanted to be "holy" not dealing with the nitty gritty of people's bodies.
So I agree with the not wishing it on your enemy, yet I have also known a deeper more connected space in healing than almost any other space. Meditating, singing ( sometimes) and making love are the only other places I have that "flow" although I am wary of terminology as often it leads to dissent if it is not the same as others' .
I do feel that Tantra in the form of opening to self, balancing light and dark, the fullness of the human experience and linking the spiritual journey with sexual energy is not only to be mainstream, but an absolute necessity to the awakening of mankind's consciousness as we move into a new era. Many spiritual teachers in differing modalities are beginning to awaken to the linking of all energies in the body to raise consciousness.
If the folk in the Tantric world keep it elite, and don't share practical ways to open energy up for people to have their awakenings is that not the ultimate separation? Maybe all are not meant to be healers or teachers, but how does keeping it elitist truly share love in its most unconditional form?

Rahasya:

Anne-Marie,
"If the folk in the Tantric world keep it elite, and don't share practical ways to open energy up for people to have their awakenings is that not the ultimate separation?"

One better known example, which means that it is not very well known outside of tantra, is the practice called Mahamudra, aka Sacred Union.
This is commonly (in the greater world of tantra as therapy, healing, sexuality, poly, bdsm, etc) taken to mean 'penis in vagina' sex.
In the old and dusty schools, it is ritualised and has mostly lost its power/function.
The 'elitist, secret' version of this practice is a neurological bonding of the masculine and feminine energies within.
Some of the method is known, some is hinted at in old literature. I have taught 'partial' and 'diluted' versions on what we call 'practitioner level' workshops.

The reason for all the caution is simple. It is a seriously dangerous practice. It has very powerful real-world consequences.
If, for example, someone suffers the usual Western condition of a divided, divisive, mutually antagonistic relationship between their inner masculine and feminine aspects, this practice will add rape, not love to that relationship.
This is likely to make the inner war so intense that it consumes all the person's prana (nerve-system energy). This means they become completely inwardly focused and have no outward energy, no capacity or capability of communicating outside of their own mind. In other words, a psychosis. Likely permanent.

We deal in love and other very powerful energies. It is part of our compassion and responsibility that we are careful in how and when we apply them.

Someone who hides the matches when you are in a room full of dynamite may be your friend.

Anne-Marie:
Rahasya, I can only speak from my own experience and from my inner guide. You have more experience than I. I have much to learn and experience, so even though I don't understand this, I will listen to your book. Yes, I get the concept of passing "dynamite" to those who have methods of dealing with it. Perhaps I saw elitism where there was caution. In my learnings with Taoism that concept of passing down carefully to avoid the misuse of "dynamite" has purpose.
Perhaps I have been guilty of drawing conclusions through vocab and words and for that I apologize :)

Rahasya:
No apology – I enjoy this discussion much.

As people read on, I wait for much more difficult criticism/exploration (wince).
I did find a lot of it very difficult to read aloud. Different from the quiet hours over the last few years, just me and the muse, just writing it down.

My favourite question so far emailed by a listener/reader:

"in your audio book, when you said Wendy had "ruined 3 or 4 men during her training" Were you speaking figuratively or literally? Might I ask what form of "ruin" are seekers likely to face? (The rocket scientist risk calculator is buzzing in my brain.)"

and, yes, he is a rocket scientist.

… The discussion continues in the Rocky Horror Tantra FaceBook group.

Listen to the Rocky Horror Book Introduction:

Track 1 Track 2 Track 3

Rocky Horror Tantra audio Book release

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:48:00 +0000

It took me nearly 5 years to write it, about ten days to record it, a few dozen hours to listen through and edit out the worst of page turning, coughing, retakes and other excitements.

My sound engineer, Gabriel, managed wonders through Josi's summer storms and guided me through the process of audio production.

Some of you know him as the muso who did the cool backing track (or whatever it is called) on a guided meditation CD I recorded a few years ago.

This whole exercise (and what is still to be done for the print version) has been a huge learning for me, alongside the nearly ten years in which I have been learning to teach, guided by those who thought of themselves as students.

The stories I tell are all fictionalised to some extent, some quite a lot. Names have been changed to protect the guilty.

I recommended an age restriction somewhere around 85. I have banned (with her wise and wholehearted agreement after a little explanation) my own mother (91) from reading it. I still have to work out what to do about my father.

A wise friend has advised me to now do as all authors and story tellers must do. The text/tape/CD/mp3 is a created thing. It has its own relationship with its readers/listeners. It even, as I discovered reading it for the audio version, has its own relationship with me now.

I thought I had good reason to believe that I knew what I was in for.

I was wrong about that. I feel well mauled, but in a good way. It is different writing late at night, just me and the Muse, from reading aloud what I have written. Especially when it gets all sexually descriptive.

Strangely liberating, though …

You may now click the following link to have your own relationship with the thing. Good Luck.

RockyHorrorTantra.com

The Goddess and the Harlot

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:50:00 +0000

“What is the relationship between the harlot and the goddess? I sometimes fear powerful women are untrustworthy as if they’re promiscuous-maybe a lot of powerful women are. I wonder if this is my own fears/projections or if there’s some truth to it.”

Thank you for voicing this. It is a common notion but because we are now encouraged to be so all-inclusive and non-judgemental, it slips into the covert of the culture, rather than being brought out into the light. So much can be written in reply – I hope I have gotten the most important bits here.

To begin: A healthy, unadulterated woman will naturally love or at the very least appreciate sex and sensuality, will likely be tactile and physically demonstrative, will love and trust the wild places both within the human psyche and without, in nature. She will be responsive, exuberant and have keen sensitivity. She will instinctively know that her body is a portal to the Divine and that the power that rises through it as sexual energy is good and wholesome and can be put to use for the health of her own organism and also the health of her family and the community where it can be directed into healing and creativity.

Your question demonstrates the associations that we have picked up from our socialisation, from our culture. The message within the patriarchal system which has dominated for the past few millennia is that the woman I speak of above is dangerous and must be controlled. In the past this has been done with a great deal of violence, particularly by religions like Christianity and Islam and is still in certain parts of the world. These days, within our culture, although it is starting to shift since the feminist movement, it is still very present in the covert attitude and such women are referred to in whispers behind hands with words like “slut”/ “harlot” / "whore". The word "Promiscuous" holds the association that for a woman to love sex is an evil thing (where as for a man, it is “normal”).

Can you imagine why such a woman would be threatening to anyone who was wanting to control a society… and why, by extension it was imperative to find ways to make such a one look dangerous? Slowly but surely the oppression of the feminine nature was so effective that even women started to believe that the only way that they could have any power was if it was given to them by a man. Thus, we even began policing each other and routing out those women who did not conform to the status quo, using the weapon of shame for having these very natural wholesome drives, to great and devastating effect, not just for women but for our whole society.

So, the relationship between whore and goddess is in the perception of the culture and also the perception the woman holds of herself. When she has bought in to what the culture has told her about being intrinsically powerless and weak because she is a woman, she may believe that she must manipulate to get power for her survival from the outside and one of her tools is seduction… so sex and intimacy deprivation is used as part of the deal making between men and women, operational within the illusion of scarcity and separation.

... that is when it is in its unconscious aspect. In the conscious aspect there is the ancient roll of the Dakini who's work it is to support you towards your full capacity for awareness, however that looks and whatever it takes, including the tools found within sexuality.

If your idea of trustworthy is a woman who will consistently behave in a way that makes you feel safe within the illusions held by our culture… (such as those around how love should look) then you are quite right that such women cannot be trusted.

If, however, your soul seeks to awaken into the fullness of your own god-self, then you can trust the direction of such a women to guide you in whatever needs to be done to shatter the illusions that keep you apart from this. Your fears are those of the ego (that in us which maintains the illusion of duality) fearing for its life and are a good indication of where to aim your rudder if you are ready to let it go.

for more on this topic, see:

http://tantraschool.co.za/sessions.html

under the heading “Tantric Practitioners: Dakinis And Dakas”

and one of my favourite pieces of writing:
http://www.buddhanature.com/buddha/vajrayogini.html

Love,

Annwen

Attachment

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:10:00 +0000

The reason why we (I) try to make all the relationship deals with each other is that we (I) would prefer to avoid the feelings associated with comparison, jealousy, abandonment and all the other uncomfortable things that emerge from Love's Pandora's box.
"Stay with me for ever and love only me ... tell me that I am good in a hundred different ways ... maybe one day I'll belive it... protect me from feeling my hurts ... do for me what I'm not prepared to do for myself... and in exchange, I will do the same for you. "
...And i get the image of two people running a three legged race, their one leg bound together- making them both crippled.

The notion of comparison is expressed uncomfortably well (for me) in an Alanis Morissette song: "Did you just call her amazing? Surely we both can't be amazing?... and give up my hard earned status as fabulous freak of nature."

Lately I've been noticing the topic of Attachment: Friends and clients/ students terrified of this and wanting to avoid it at all costs by steering well clear of anything with a whiff of commitment. Or, trying to have the delights and comfort of consistent companionship, but Not get attached.

I have felt the flavours of attachment in my system today. I can feel the potential of one or two of the above statements.
This time I'm experimenting with it. In stead of blaming the beloved for uncomfortable feelings, or berating myself for my Horrible Weakness (my particular default in these things), or trying to suppress and get on with something else, I am going for a different approach.

The phantoms emerge from the box I have opened with my willingness to love. They poses me and I feel them in my body. Stomach. Shoulders. Chest. My mind would like to explain them, give them names: Its gallant attempt at protecting me from them... but Awareness is selecting something other than that default setting. Lying on my back, i take a deep breath in and draw all of the discomfort into my heart. I take it in. Deep, deep, deeper. More and more. Saying Yes to all of it. Pain and tears come. I keep going, inviting them in untill I feel the ful extent that i can access now.

It takes a few breaths. My body shakes and weeps. And then, a kind of magic happens. On the in breath: pain, but on the out breath: something else... Peace. More breaths, more peace, less pain.
The heart is an alchemical fire, turning this lead to gold. Or like a tree, taking in the carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen... and Love.

Over time, using this meditation, I can feel my heart's expanding capacity. And lately I've found that the more I can feel in my heart, the more i can feel in my body too... such powerful, healing love making I have had after allowing something like this to move through me.

So... my take on attachment is GO for it. Allow the danger of it, allow the fullest deepest, most vulnerable expression of your love and devotion - whatever the perceived risk. Do not deprive yourself and the world of this. And when there's pain, we both know now what to do. If you can, do not grasp at the beloved to rescue you from this, nor resist the feelings that emerge. Take it in. It's Heart Food.

Here is the Advait Tantra School's guided heart meditation which I've described above. I still listen to it, even though i know it well now.

http://tantraschool.co.za/members/heart/Heart%20Meditation-02.mp3
User name: annwen
Password: tantra101

Love, however it looks
Annwen ♥

Here it begins ~ Yogini Journey

noreply@blogger.com (annwen mazetti) — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:22:00 +0000

Here it begins

Hmmm, gratitude...: I fell asleep watching the stars above the southern hills. Now the light is oranging its way up those rocks. A speed boat streaks across the calm sea and cool air comes with its quiet caress on my morning skin. I'm feeling awe at the magical movements in my life.

I stood naked in my doorway except for a string of Mala beads - a gift to mark my initiation - as Rahasya, my teacher, left me yesterday after his month's stay, saying: Goodbye Yogini.
We had decided that I would start practising. An hour later I mentioned this to someone on line and they booked a session for last night at 8.
I panicked silently... and said Yes. They came and I did it: Well, I believe...
I love bodies. I love touch. I love loving. Awakening consciousness and capacity for love and bliss is the most important thing in my life... I am in my element.

I am a tantrika... Here it begins.
Where will this lead, I wonder. How will this affect me having my own mate and family?
In this territory there are fewer and fewer road signs. I head off into an exquisite wilderness. My guides are stars and orange rocks and instinct and the breath of sea air on skin. The subtle whispers saying This way... That way...
I am an adventurer, an explorer of the Heart Land.

Tantric Touch Q&A

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:45:00 +0000

From Yogini Annwen, a touch work practitioner in this school:

Tantric Touch Work ~ Q ‘n A

Client: So what is tantric touch work, exactly?

Annwen: In this Advaita tantra school, we have two ways of working. From the top down –eroticism, in other words working with the mind’s ideas around sex- and from the bottom up: touch work. Touch work supports the person into expanding their capacity to feel: Learning to feel pleasure, trust the body, love the body- learning how to love themselves and then they can be more qualified to love another.So Shakti Malan, for example, is a Dakini. I am a Yogini. A yogini follows the forms of touch work and works within that structure. Dakinis have less use for structure. They will do whatever it takes to get you to awaken…. They have licence to scare the hell out of you to speed up the process. Touch work may be considered a gentler approach, but it is in fact just as challenging for the one who is holding on tightly to that which has protected him/ her, but now imprisons and prevents intimacy. A Dakini may start with this work and then move on to eroticism work. I will leave eroticism up to the Dakinis… for now.

Client: So, through touch you experience more... emotional feelings?

Annwen: Yes… and through more deep emotional feeling you experience more physical feeling too

Client: hmm, does not make sense to me, must be an experiential thing.

Annwen: do you know the term body armouring?...
When experiences happen- especially as children- that are too much for us to feel, we put the experience away for later. We develop this armouring in the body (a holding, a tension- an unconscious pattern) to protect us from that feeling.
In Tantra, Now is Later.
Being supported by having someone see this armouring and work with you to soften and dissolve it will release the blocked feeling…which can be tough... especially when we really resist this happening, as we are likely to do because we're scared. And of course then you have to Feel everything you have been resisting all this time.
But, once this kind of congealed holding is softened and dropped, our capacity to feel bliss deepens. Bliss is our birthright.
From the other direction, when you become willing to feel more emotional depth - like, the tricky, sticky, yikky emotions... you will find, surprise, surprise... that your capacity to feel in the body increases too. This has been my most recent learning

Client: Aaaaah, OK I get that
So what are the forms of touch work?

Annwen: The three approaches that I am using are Tantra Massage, Chakra Massage and Tantric Balancing.
Tantra Massage involves developing an awareness of sexuality and love beyond our conventional interpretations.
Chakra Massage addresses resistance, numbness, discomfort, repression, trauma and judgement
Tantric balancing supports integration and inner love making of the masculine and feminine

I will make use of these different approaches as I see the need for them arising.

No-sex Tantra

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:00:00 +0000

A friend of mine went searching for a particular teacher. He was interested to track the old roots of wild, south Indian preferably Dravidian tantra and advaita.

He found exactly who he was looking for – a Dravidian advaita teacher of an ancient tantric lineage.

Naturally, the fellow was doing as his ancestors had done, sitting in the shade of a wide banyan tree.

Conversation ensued, and over the next few days, my friend was treated to a feast of ancient lore and deep philosophical discussion.

It was a delight to hear of this lineage. We both enjoyed the traditional and fresh expressions of understanding that he had encountered, ignoring our companions a bit rudely.

At some point, my friend commented that in many general and some specific areas, this taste of an ancient teaching had been remarkably similar to what he had encountered around this school.

"Practice too?" I inquired.

"No." He replied. "That was the one startling difference."

"How so?" I asked, intrigued, always interested to discover new methods.

"No sex."

"None?"

"Well, he spoke of some methods and rituals, but from the moment of his attainment, no sex."

"Did he care to share why?"

"I asked, and he said not all lineages have the same insistence, but in his lineage, it is mandatory. He says that without this condition, the teachings he preserves and continues would have died out thousands of years ago."

There was obviously more to this. I waited in respectful patience, or perhaps hurried him with further questions. Whatever the details, he shared the story.

"The first master of the guru's lineage was apparently a little overwhelmed by his attainment. He was, here and there, a little irresponsible with his powers.

At some point, the Gods got a little annoyed and had a meeting to discuss the issue. Agreeing that something should be done to teach a lesson, but not knowing what lesson, or how it should be delivered, the Gods eventually turned to a Goddess for help.

The Goddess listened to their issue, agreed that a lesson had to be taught and that she would deliver it.

Appearing before the guru, she danced a dance of sublime seduction. Even though he was past all need, all craving for sex, he was disturbed. This was, after all, a Goddess working him over.

She evoked his arousal and, far far worse, his ejaculation. Just with her dance.

The guru was, as the English would say, unmanned.

From that point on, he taught that no-sex was essential to the survival of his teaching."

I digested this for a while. This variation on a story I had heard often had got my attention.

I knew from my own experience that chastity is a comfortable and perfectly available option once the lean-pig hunger of sexuality stops. Even if sex continues for teaching, fun or any other reason, ejaculation is optional, and some choose to never do that.

I considered what difference it would make to my life and teaching if I had inherited or developed such an insistence myself. My first impression would be that it would be a lot easier.

Easier because … well, because …

Suddenly I saw the why, the reason behind this far away guru's no-sex insistence.

I rejoined the conversation, which had barely paused while i had swum in thoughts.

"So, was he enjoying his irresponsibility?"

"Like what?" My friend, not sharing my particular curiosity, was a little confused.

"Well, you notice the difference between his lifestyle and mine?"

My friend looked around the quaint 3rd world cottage I inhabit. "Not that different."

"Not that, and sure, if we had proper African heat in winter here, I could enjoy a banyan tree too. I mean the difference that comes from his no-sex thing."

He looked at one of the companions we were almost ignoring, a Dakini he has known as long as he has known me. She was smiling, obviously a step or two ahead of us males.

"The difference is…" He said, looking from her smile to mine "You get bossed about by them."

"Yes. They keep me on the straight and narrow." This got a laugh from the Dakini, who then got involved in discussing more interesting things with my daughter.

"According to the Dravidian guru, you are vulnerable to them."

"Yes. When I get irresponsible, they are there to slap me immediately. Hence I do not push things so far that divine intervention is required. At least not yet."

"And he is safe from that kind of trouble …" my friend mused.

"He is safe from much more than that."

"Like what?"

"Well, as you know, I take my direction from the Dakinis." This earned me a derisive comment from one of our unnamed companions, which I choose not to repeat. "More or less, anyway." Another derisive comment which I manfully ignored.

"Your friend in India, however, gets to decide how he teaches, who he teaches, the context that suits him and so on. If he had…" I smiled at the source of derisive comments "If he had such wonderful supports and guides for his teaching, he would do …"

"A hell of a lot more, for sure." My friend replied. "He really has some very cool stuff, and a strong energy, but he is not interested in traveling or being very welcoming. It is kind of a pity …"

"I don't know about that." I interrupted. "He is right about it being essential to the survival of his lineage, to the preservation of knowledge and method."

"But, now, with the world enjoying these teachings, he could do so much more."

"Well, for now at least, his no-sex thing seems to be keeping him safe. I am sure if that has to change, the right Goddess will be there to sort things out."

What happens in a tantra session?

noreply@blogger.com (Shima) — Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:24:00 +0000

I am so often asked this question and wonder how can I possibly explain ( or make flat ) the mystery of a tantra session. Every word I pronounce seems a shadow of the experience.

So today I call the land of words to bear you into this mystery.. om namah.

Firstly people arrive at the door for a number of reasons ..

All things sexual

Sexual healing .. Sexual mastery .. Sexual confusion .. Sexual fulfillment (wanting a sexual service).

The relationship dance

Drama ..confusion .. challenges .. ultimately resolving the age old masculine - feminine conflict.

Reclaiming the true feminine

Accessing the goddess and calling the return of the feminine that has been denied for the longest time ever.

Reclaiming the true masculine

Meeting and living from the true masculine and dropping the distortion -replacement of patriarchy.

Wanting to be a better person and live a better life

Wanting to know or understand the true self

Unresolved pain and rage

A dakini can also be a very powerful guide in terms of career and power strategy as she has come to a deep understanding of this energy in herself and she is also an exquisite muse and midwife of all creative endeavours.

What I have come to see as a tantrika or what has been my occult or hidden intent in the session ...

My first love is awareness. I did not always know this. I was interested in money and survival, how to have orgasms and experience bliss and pleasure in my life, how to attract a beautiful man and be in a sweet togetherness, how to get on with others and also be true to myself and always very interested in the mystery of that which is not seen or easily tangible ..existence god soul.These were some of my interests along the way as it is for most human beings.

But what I have come to know is that all of these interests were ultimately teachers and guides of awareness.

So what is awareness? Before I knew awareness in the same way as a lover comes to know her beloved, I believed awareness was about knowledge. If one learnt enough about things and life and people then you would know how or what to do in any given moment or experience, but it is not this at all.

Awareness is a tangible presence; pulsing, alive and fully available in the moment beyond thought or any knowledge.. the delightful, delicious, spontaneous participation moment to moment sans mind.

This is what I teach or share...

This is not to say that a tantra session may not look like an intense exploration of one's sexual healing and or mastery , relationship dynamics and the exploration of the truth of reality but in this exploration there is always and foremost the subtle calling and befriending of awareness.

One finds that yes tantrikas are deeply and sincerely interested in sexuality and tantric sex is beyond all imagination. I would never have known such sex was possible without experiencing it for myself.

But this interest is the carrot of Existence that brings you to awareness and when you taste this awareness then the interest shifts. From super amazing sex to awareness, from delightful relationships to awareness. If awareness is first all that we seek, desire and long for follows. Perhaps not as we THOUGHT it but as it it sweetly is..

If I can assist in calling awareness into your being than you can meet any moment in totality and truth sans the reactive and conditioned state that you currently know as yourself.

Whatever happens in a tantra session the intent is to befriend awareness.

The tantric way is the path of the lover. The dakini guides you into falling in love with your self, your fellow travelers and finally the moment and then awareness is met in the core of your being as your constant lover companion where all else follows.

I offer tantra sessions in Johannesburg to women, men and couples. A session is approximately 2 hours long and much happens in a session. You will be very surprised at what you walk away with. If you remember the scene from Matrix where Neo is hooked up to the computer and information is being downloaded. He looks up and says " I know Kung Fu". Tantra sessions can have a similar feeling.

If you are interested in a session please email me shima@shima.co.za.

I will be offering a tantra practitioner training later this year. If you feel you have the calling for this work or are already in a similar field and would like to bring the tantric understanding into your work please let me know.

Namasté
Shima opening Lotus

Is Tantra against relationship?

noreply@blogger.com (Dakini Wendy) — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:52:00 +0000

This was received from a student who's wife has not approved of him working with us. He outlines her complaint.

S.. has voiced some concerns about the school which I share to a large extent.

From conversations that S..had with Wendy, it seems like many men who take advantage of the schools offerings services do so behind the backs of their partners. It is difficult to imagine how a sustainable and holistic transformation in people’s lives can be accomplished when this involves people being less than completely honest with those who are closest to them. There is much that is questionable and worthy of review about the institution of marriage, but the fact remains that those women who married the men you are working with have dedicated their lives to them, trust them and raise children with them. This, in each case, is a major responsibility and it seems the school does not do what it takes to make sure that its work does not jeopardize this responsibility. This is all the more important because the school touches people’s lives at such a profound level.

When someone approaches me for a session I do not refuse him or her on the basis that there is some distortion in the sexuality or in relationship. Part of my work as a Dakini is to bring awareness to how the energies are flowing in the person and then to resolve the unconscious aspects so allowing the essential quality to be revealed. If a man comes to me with many constraints and lies to himself and his partner then we will begin to look at the lies and to notice how they are running his life.

The repressed qualities are ultimately a cause of some hurt and misunderstandings about the Truth.

I do not believe that a man not telling his wife he is working with me is wrong as such … it may be he is experiencing the freedom of how his life force flows and his Divine right to move energy where it guides him. When a person is attuned to one's own Being there is trust that whatever wants to flow in the moment can be surrendered to.

Guiding a person to exterior and then interior honesty is an important step on the path. In the pursuit of this it is not unusual for me to suggest communicating what is unfolding for them to their partner. Sometimes I make further sessions conditional around this issue. Wherever possible I will support couples in their lives together. Tantra recognises three major paths and I will work with you whatever your relationship structure.

The quality of devotion that women have to their husbands and children is exquisite and there is understandably an urge to protect it. The fear that comes with thoughts of its loss must be explored and resolved. I guess there is a belief that if a man learns something about himself with other women then the security of the home is threatened. It need not be so. At some point you must realise that using all your energy to keep a man faithful proves exhausting, painful and unproductive. In Tantra we encourage women to use their energy for their own awareness and to assist men to their potential not their constraints.

I am not in objection to what this couple is going through because I see their awareness is growing stronger and they are moving towards deeper intimacy.

Blessings...

Gifts from times past

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:11:00 +0000

Tantra is about the catalysis and acceleration of awareness. Tantra is not bound to any particular deity system, philosophy, cultural background or teaching modality.

Tantra is religion at it's liveliest. It has the passionate love of truth that most of the established religions started with. It has standards, views on what constitutes a worthwhile teaching, and ongoing, responsive quality control.

Sometimes, a teaching grows from previous teachings. Sometimes, a patriarchal lineage happens, a disciple or two of each generation completing their path in comfortable timing.

More usually, the appearance, the illusion of a patriarchal lineage and the development/revelation of teachings appropriate to the times has been managed from behind the scenes by Dakinis.

Often, Tantra had to present itself in a form that was alluring or scary to the surrounding culture. Sometimes it had to disappear. Sometimes, it had to infiltrate the prevailing organised religions.

Some branches did not develop, either pruned through losing the support and acknowledgment of Dakinis or just failing to produce capable teachers for a few generations.

Sometimes this was ugly, disciples becoming focused on a particular characteristic of (or attributed to) their historic guru and emulating that characteristic in stupid and excessive ways as only men can. Examples include (in increasing order of severity) ritual mutilation of the penis, obsessions with ejaculation and sexual repression.

Sometimes it was beautiful, the disciples preserving yoga exercises, dances, rituals, books, attitudes and methods for later generations and fresher lineages to borrow from.

The treasures of ancient tantra have been reaching the West for a long time. Gems like the Vigyan Bhairav Tantra and the poems of Rumi . These and the other gifts of history have contributed much to the development of Western Tantra. Recently, Daniel Odier's Tantric Quest, translating the understanding of Kashmir and Judith Simmer Brown's Dakini's Warm Breath urge a more complete, more mature understanding.

Tantra is always a fresh awareness, an arising of new understanding. Tantra is always at the beginning (a teacher and a few students) stage of development as a religion. One of the oldest and wisest sayings in Tantra is "Stay at the beginning." This applies at least as much in tantric practice and teaching as it does in making love.

The Celibate, the Householder and the Tantrika

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:22:00 +0000

Tantric teachings are layered onion style because existence is layered, onion style.

Tantra recognises no distinction between worldly and spiritual endeavor. One's whole life is the path, no part excepted. No need to renounce sex, power or money. Existence can provide the necessary lessons, trials, hardships and challenges in the worldly context at least as effectively as in a monastic setting.

Truth is one. The ways of approaching it are many.

In Tantra, three main archetypes, directions of approach, are known: The paths of Celibate, Householder and Tantrika. Which one is appropriate to you at any point in time, is probably the one you are doing. This distinction of directions is more about where a student is coming from than where he is going. None of them is inherently superior. All lead to the same truth.

The Celibate

In Christendom, celibacy is more or less synonymous with chastity. Chastity basically means no sex.

Celibacy, in the tantric context means unmarried. Just that. Nothing about regularity or irregularity of sexual activity implied. Celibates are unmarried.

The celibate has particular emphasis on her beloved being existence itself. A celibate does not make demands on a lover's availability, and is not open to demands on her availability.

Refusing the paradigm of marriage and relationship, refusing to own or be owned, the celibate becomes richly aware of the expectations and beliefs inherited from parents and culture.

Living through times of lovers and times of no lovers with no attitude of ownership forces one to face one's fears, limiting beliefs and habits without the luxury of having someone else to blame.

Relating to every lover as a gift from the beloved, from existence itself, challenges one to experience them deeply. It challenges one to engage to one's full depths and capacity. There is no sense in holding back, reserving intimacy, when the beloved is there. Adept celibates enjoy the kind of intimacy that can result from 5 years of marriage… on a first date.

The greatest danger to a celibate is using their celibacy as a way to avoid intimacy, depth and emotions. Keeping encounters with lovers shallow in a counter-productive attempt to avoid pain.

The Householder

The householder's focus is relationship. Whatever the particular relationship form, it has rules, guidelines and a concept of ownership.

The householder explores the truth of attachment, need and ownership through the context of relationship.

The form of a householder's relationship can be conventionally monogamous, poly, open, swinging, gay, hetero or any other variant. However it looks, though, those involved in the relationship agree to rules and guidelines.

The rules of relationship, whatever they are, can teach external, then internal honesty. Submitting to the constraints of relationship with sincerity can ready one for the far greater submission to existence itself.

Householders also often raise children, which is one of the most intensive ways to learn the truths of love.

Relationship is a kind of training wheels for love. Learning to love one person can be far harder than loving an abstract notion like Humanity, or … Relationship. When love worthy of the name happens, the koan of the relationship is answered.

The path of the householder benefits from experimentation/renegotiation between forms of relationship and sexual skills/energy development. The greatest danger is preferring comfort to totality.

The Tantrika

The tantrika's path is the direct exploration of the lessons of tantra, overlapping learning from teachers with learning by teaching.

Tantrikas seldom agree to monogamy, and when they do, their intention is either to complete the relationship dramas they inherited from their own parenting or to help the partner with that work. Sometimes both.

Wherever they are, and whatever they are doing, they are always in school. Always deliberately learning.

Tantrikas experiment in their own lives, trying out ideas like ownership and freedom, living at various times in communality, alone and with partner(s). Their loyalty is always to what they can learn, not to the context in which they find the lesson.

One of a tantrika's particular challenges is discerning between their own current highest understanding, that which they just glimpse – and things they know well, and can usefully teach. Another is teaching that which is easy, comfortable or profitable for too long, thus losing their own momentum.

Much of the acceleration of a tantrika's path comes from her willingness to help others. The emphasis of the tantrika is to love existence in meaningful and practical ways. The heat and pressure of this path is the experience of teaching that which one needs to learn – learning by helping.

Commonalities and differences

Most tantric paths fit one of these descriptions, at least for major stretches of their journey. Existence, however has no rigid distinctions. Some tantrikas really look like householders. Some celibates look a lot like tantrikas, some householders seem more celibate than the celibates.

In all cases, the inevitable restrictions and restraints of the path(s) chosen are used as a heat, a pressure, an acceleration and refinement of awareness.

None of them is inherently superior or faster than the others. None of them penetrates to greater truths or produces greater gurus than any other.

There is no choice to make. It is a calling kind of thing. Call it the predestined part of your existence. The choice you have is, as always, to dance with it and welcome it, or endure it in fighting and frustration.

I am perhaps a bit known for harping on about the harshness of the path, so this time, I will try to end things sweetly.

Each path has it's own particular delight. Celibates celebrate freedom. Householders celebrate connection. Tantrikas celebrate celebration, then start planning a workshop on celebration.

Throwing Rocks and Unbounded Teaching

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:04:00 +0000

Please note that Tantra was just one of the topics at last year's Sexuality and Consciousness conference. A lot of useful, healing and generally worthwhile things were discussed, as well as these aspects of tantra.

A lot of ideas exchanged in a short period of time is a bit of a rollercoaster, and it takes everyone a little time to get appropriate perspective on what they have heard, notice the connections and distinctions in what they have heard and so on.

Even then, ideas can get mixed, and incorrect interpolations can be made. Two notions expressed at last year's Consciousness and Sexuality conference got a little mixed, which resulted in a little confusion and misunderstanding.

This is no bad thing of course, and I am sure we will have a higher, wilder ride at this year's conference. The range of arts, sciences, systems and approaches relevant to various levels of consciousness and sexuality related work should be even wider than last year's.

The ideas that got mixed were rock-throwing and boundaries.

Throwing Rocks

Rock throwing is a description from the student's end of things, describing what it is, what it takes to approach a Dakini. The traditional image is that one approaches her cave and tries to get close enough to leave a gift, present her with a gift, engage her in discussion or, ideally, ask for her teaching. She makes this hard, throwing rocks, rubbishing the supplicant's learning to date, rejecting his gifts and so on.

From the Dakini's end of things, the student approaches, and she starts teaching him immediately. What he may feel to be "rocks" … criticism, direction, difficult conditions and so on are his mind-ego's expected response to her first lessons. Traditionally, by overcoming the obstacles, the hurdles the Dakini puts in his path.

The obstacles she seems to create are often challenges to the student to overcome their own obstacles. It is a useful metaphor, especially at the beginning of the journey. It can seem harsh to a student that a Dakini insists on him having no alcohol before a session. It can seem weird that she insists he take a course in basic massage techniques, or insists that he stop taking erection-support or feel-good medication.

A Dakini's more mundane rocks are for the merely curious and the currently horny-and-can-google.

As Shakti puts it on one of her blogs:

I am going to politely send him away or at least question him more:

• If he does not say his name or clearly has to think about what his name is
• if he expects me to be available immediately for a session
• if he wants me to fix a sexual problem but is not interested in inner change
• if he is looking for a 'tantric massage' (which in the South African context usually means he is looking for someone to fulfill a sexual need - not the job of a Dakini)

So altogether, standing alone as a notion in it's own right, this "throwing rocks" thing is a good and useful part of teaching, especially when one has to filter those with the willingness and capacity from those who would be better off elsewhere, at least for a while.

Boundaries and Ethics

Dakinis are not bound by any boundaries, conditions, or, in the conventional sense, ethics in their sessions work. A very scary notion for some at first sight. It is clearly not a generally appropriate or workable approach to most therapies, healing modalities and so on. These things clearly need boundaries on the part of the practitioner, and the student's development/discovery of his own boundaries is sometimes the conscious agenda.

The prevalent view in the culture is that a child needs clear boundaries from his parents, and that boundaries are the foundational expression of parental love.

Dakini Shima describes it in a FB note thus:

When you are little, your parents find your unbounded energy to be dangerous and disruptive. If your energy has no boundary then you may not look before you run in front of a truck.

The regular cultural understanding of ethics and boundaries is that these things are necessary to any conscious interaction. They give a framework for agreement and clarify the context. Their absence implies a lack of caring, safety and compassion.

A Dakini, however, is deeply familiar with unbounded caring, love beyond safety and compassion beyond the realm of conventional ethics. She engages her students at a level beyond the usual agendas of healing and therapeutic work. There are boundaries – the student's boundaries. Awareness of these is encouraged, developed and, lessons learned, later often discarded.

Dakini Wendy uses these lines of Rumi's to describe her sessions work:

Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing,
there is a field. I'll meet you there.

Dakinis have renounced the Original Sin described in the Christian book. They make no claim to the divine knowledge of good and evil. They work instead on refining their aesthetic, how they would like things to look. Osho once said that aesthetics would be the ethics of the future.

I look forward to further sharing, exploration, discussion and controversy at the next next Consciousness and Sexuality conference in South Africa, happening in early December 2010.

The Guru Catch-22

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:38:00 +0000

This article was prompted by a thread on FB where the fairly predictable opinions about the finances and sincerity of teachers and gurus, particularly ones of the tantric persuasion were being expressed.

I fail to see what a teacher's finances have to do with their teaching. Buddha sent his students begging, Jesus' guys collected from the poor, who are still their major source of income. Gurdjieff did all kinds of things, including making bets to generate income so his students could concentrate on the work. There was a lovely Indian Guru that supported himself by selling beedies. Most ashram founders charged their students, or did deals with the local oligarchy for funding. Milarepa's guru had him build a house.

Making one's teaching one's living can often be a more effective way to support seekers than riding two horses. For example, Shakti Malan PhD was well paid as a consultant to huge corporates. Leaving that rich source of income and focusing on her teaching has made it possible for her to do far more retreats, workshops and sessions than she could part time. Her income from her teaching is not comparable to her corporate rates, and she makes an effort to make all her work as affordable as possible.

On my own path, I am glad to have supported my teachers with donations, their fees, helping on workshops, encouraging others to their work. While I was in a position to do so, I freely accommodated and provided retreat space for a teacher and around twenty students, for months.

I suspect that this financial issue is mostly just "beginner mind' shying away from the path, finding an excuse to avoid. The teacher can be seen as "suspect" with very little mental effort.

Naturally, it is just as reflexive to regard a teacher as not-worth-hearing on account of his lack of wealth or cheap/free rates. This is perhaps more prevalent in the world of tantra. Recently I saw an article about a lovely young yogini which stressed her world record sessions pricing more or less as proof of her degree of attainment.

Of course, what is usually behind worries about guru finances is a worry about insincerity, the possibility of having to drink the cool-aid, sexual or psychological abuse, unhealthy or misguided practices, becoming terrorists, just wasting time and so on.

Very understandable, but this is why seekers have intelligence. Mind control cults are very easy to spot, being just intensive mini-versions of the Abrahamic religions. Their characteristics are well known: Claims of infallibility of the leadership, imposed beliefs, militant songs and a limited reading list.

I practice a reasonably high-paying craft, which I enjoy and could make far more income from if I paid it 10% the attention I give to my teaching. If earning money was my objective, I would have done far better with that over the last several years, and would have been far less available as a teacher.

Certainly, I would like my teaching to reach more of the people it should, and make enough money to support a comfortable place for people to visit and learn. In the meantime, the local mostly excellent B+B's work fine. My aesthetic in the matter is that I would like students to contribute towards this. It is, after all, for them, not for me.

Over the years, I have noticed too, that on any workshop it is the "freebies" that tend to take up the bulk of everyone's time with nonsense and their need for extra attention and special treatment … which is of course, why they are freebies in the first place. People that are interested enough to pay at least something for a teacher's time are obviously more sincere in their interest.

Not that I always charge money … Prospective Dakas and Dakinis in this school determine their own level of involvement, and I am always as available to them as I can manage. It is my delight that I manage to spend most of my time with them. The payment I demand from these close beloveds is my version of the old Bodhisattva vow – that they will pass on what they have learned when they encounter those that need it.

Personally, I have heard what the Fox network calls fair and balanced stuff about my teaching. Two diametrically opposed sides. One bunch figures me as no good on account of the fortune I am supposedly making as a new-age-pimp. The other bunch points the finger at my very modest income as proof of my personal fnancial issues, which, of course, disqualifies me as a worthwhile person to learn from.

My focus though, is my teaching – not what money I could make from it. It is also entirely possible that school finances will improve at some point, even embarrassingly. However things evolve to look, I'm sure it will be fun and a delight. It certainly has been that so far.

Discussion with Al Link of 4 Freedoms Tantra

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:07:00 +0000

The original unedited version of this discussion with Al Link and Pala Copeland of 4 Freedoms Tantra is at Healing International. Ning account required, not payment.

Can Sex and Spirit Go Together?

There is a widespread assumption and belief that sex is antagonistic or contra-indicated in connection with one’s spiritual practice; that it has nothing to do with “real” Tantra. Furthermore, the implied or frequently openly asserted statement is that sex is bad, dirty, and dangerous; some would go so far as to say, sinful.

This orientation of belief is rampant in virtually all major religions, and in virtually in all spiritual disciplines. Tantra is often assumed to be an exception to this, but there is an attempt to marginalize those who incorporate sacred sexual practices into their spiritual practice as “not practicing real Tantra.” Some therefore refer to Tantra practices including sacred sexuality, as Neo (new) Tantra, presumably reserving Tantra for the “correct” spiritual approach, whatever that might be.

This is an extremely unfortunate (although sincere and well-intentioned) bias, and is incorrect. In fact the problem is not too much sex, but rather the repression of it. The repression of sex leads to a twisted, dirty, dangerous and selfish sexuality. Any basic human need that is repressed will not go away, it will simply go “underground,” being pushed into the dark shadow of our deeper consciousness (where we put everything else that we don’t understand and are afraid of), only to erupt at times in ways that tend to be selfish, addictive, sleezy, dirty, dangerous and violent. Of course this is the reason why there is so much fear around this absolutely powerful natural organic energy.

It is useless and less than helpful to continue to propagate this ancient deception upon innocent people, including sincere persons wishing to undertake their spiritual journeys. What is required is not to say “no” to sex, but “know.” There is nothing about sex that is required, but on the other hand there is nothing forbidden either, with the exceptions of abuse, force and violence. The spiritual challenge and opportunity is for sincere, mature, consenting adults to learn about a natural, organic, healthy, passionate and spiritual sexuality.

Learning to work consciously with the hot sexual energy is one of the most important spiritual practices. Furthermore, these practices date back thousands of years. Tantra, including sacred sexuality, can lead directly to enlightenment, and in fact is certainly one of the simplest, most direct spiritual paths. Undeniably it is a path of pleasure rather than pain and suffering, which so many spiritual seekers, and unfortunately many spiritual finders, continue to perpetuate, with stories that can easily lead seekers to conclude that the only way to enlightenment is though pain and suffering.

On the contrary, pleasure and happiness are far more “user friendly” spiritual paths. It must be obvious, that just because someone who had been previously leading a life filled with pain and suffering, then became enlightened, does not mean that the only way to enlightenment is through pain and suffering. Similarly, if one who has no legs becomes enlightened, it would be absurd for followers to have their legs amputated. Just because sex was not part of the path of one who became enlightened, hardly justifies anyone to say, sex can’t be, or should not be, part of a spiritual practice.

No enlightened person will ever tell another how they must act to become enlightened. The counterpoint to that is the interesting question if an enlightened person would ever tell a seeker what they could not do. While it is true that an enlightened person can tell others in the most generalized sense, what to do and what not to do, that advice will never include specific behaviors. For example, an enlightened person can legitimately say, “be kind, compassionate and loving;” or they could say, “avoid attachment, selfishness, and addiction.” But an enlightened person would never say, “don’t have sex; sex is bad, dirty, dangerous and sinful.” No enlightened person would ever say, “sex will prevent you from becoming enlightened.”

Al Link
4 Freedoms Relationship Tantra
SexySpiritualRelationships

SOME POSTS DELETED

Reply by Jesper Bockfeldt: What I have come to be convinced about on our journey heir on earth is that: First we have to learn to take responsibility for ourselves and our actions. Secondly we need to learn forgiveness for ourselves and others. Thirdly we need to learn to be in the present here and now, which is very connected with the body and one of the reasons to why we are down on earth in this form, and of course sex is a natural part of that. Of course sex has been diminished through time as it is a strong energy many can fear if they don’t understand it and want to control others (the church, society in general etc.) though times are changing and people consciousness are being raised – but there is a long way to go jet :-) We can only self be the guiding lights for others be living our life with love and happiness – though it can be hard to shine in a room where all others energy works as a big cloud of smoke – then it is good we can meet heir ;-)



Of course love and sex can go together, but not just any kind of sex at all; only a loving, respectful, mature, informed, knowledgeable, and skillful sexuality is a divine sexuality. In other words there is some learning required if you are to advance or graduate from simple animal friction sex to energy sex and soul sex. We suggest that sex is good for three reasons. First it will bring you pleasure and that is good. Second, sex actually has moral force when it is an expression of love between two people. Finally sex that becomes a meditation shared by the lovers awakens them to the direct personal experience of the divine within; a direct experience of God-consciousness or enlightenment. The moment of illumination typically progresses from an experience of union between the lovers, to a shattering of all ego boundaries with the awakening to the direct experience that everything is one thing, and you are it; and that one thing is consciousness, not stuff. You are not your body, you occupy a body. At the moment of illumination you realize your oneness with all and everything. When I am in that place of oneness and my beloved is in that place of oneness, there is only one of us.


: In my school, it seems to be more about "stages", although there is considerable overlap. Starting from the usual condition, i.e. a repressed awareness around sexuality, Osho's Neo-Tantra approach is vital. At this stage, trying to insist on, or even discern "spiritual" sex from "profane/worldly" sex is pointless. One has to work with what one has. The first work consists in breaking your taboos and removing repression. Next, it is necessary to honestly address your eroticism, no matter how that may look. If something is in your erotic makeup, it has to be faced, probably has to be experienced that it may reveal the truth it is covering. This is often very painful, confronting and harsh work. Tantra is the fastest of paths, but is not a shortcut. On any path, one has to lose all attachments to the mind's version of things. No mind finds this other than horrendously painful. Much of my work with my students is to support them through this essential raw and painful time of absolute honesty. For a Tantrika worthy of the name, some illusions around their sexuality need to be destroyed. Few get beyond e.g. just their jealousy without having to move through considerable emotional pain. When the psychopathology has been addressed and made conscious, sex is revealed for what it truly is. Sex becomes "just sex" … no fantasies, needs or dependencies. At this point (and not a moment before) sexual meditations becomes possible and useful. Most of a seeker's neo-tantra work can be addressed by teachers with personal experience of that stage of the work. It is useful to pretty much all seekers, not just tantrikas. To encourage that work, I think it is OK to use the lie "Tantra is transcendence through bliss. Full body orgasms lead to enlightenment" as a marketing ploy, an encouragement. The next stage of the work, the practice of sexual meditations, is rarely useful or fruitful if it is just a matter of playing with learned/borrowed techniques. A teacher of significant experience in this area is required. Such a teacher requires guidance/support from their teacher, who in turn needs to have completed their own path. Hence, they are rare. A school of tantra that is capable of guiding a tantrika the full distance the path goes can be recognised by the traditional structure, unchanged in the modern world, of Dakas, Dakinis and a Guru. The Dakas (male practitioners) will work to the direction of the school's Dakinis (female practitioners). The Dakinis will teach without any limitation or boundary on the techniques they use or the degree of intimacy involved. They teach directly, unambiguously, sexually – the only way Tantra as such can be taught. The Dakinis will be supported by the Guru, sometimes male, more often female. Someone who no longer does "relationship" or need/craving based sex. Someone who has completed their path.

Hello Rahasya, Your comments are so very welcome here and much appreciated. The knowledge, experience and intelligence you bring to this important topic is evident. Regarding stages, of course the usual experience of personal and spiritual growth, is that one goes through stages. But at the moment of illumination, the instant of awakening to enlightenment, one understands that there are no stages, that there is nothing incremental about enlightenment. But it is of little help advising anyone against engaging in some spiritual path, a path that as they progress along it, seems to include the experience of incremental growth toward some desired goal or end, i.e., awakening to full enlightenment. It does seem that undertaking the spiritual quest, then at some point giving up the search, without giving up the desire or the vision of awakening, is required. Exactly which path, how to engage that path, how long to persevere, etc. is a matter of personal choice, of personal freedom. The conundrum is that what one “sees” or “knows” from within enlightenment, cannot be seen or known from within the illusion of ego separation. It would be like expecting, that because one has eyes he should be able to see for a hundred miles, and of course that cannot happen. One can try to communicate what enlightenment is, what it is like, but this is always less than satisfactory, and always with mixed and unpredictable results for a spiritual seeker. It is even more difficult, impossible I would insist, to tell anyone how to become enlightened; even enlightened masters (those not only who have been there once, but are currently in that state as they speak) cannot do that. I am certain that advising anyone how to become enlightened, by telling them either what they must do, or on the contrary, what they cannot do, is not only futile, it is also robbing the spiritual seeker of their freedom and denying them the necessity of being responsible for themselves. Hence, when it comes to sexuality, it is extremely important to avoid making absolute statements about what, when, where, with whom, etc., that anyone else must do or not do. It is of course possible for a teacher to try to pass on what they have learned, and what they think they know, and what they believe to be true, but they must admit to the learner, that it is all they are doing, not passing along absolute truth. What anyone can say to another about sexuality, is that learning about it is a necessity, not an option, and then provide any honest assistance one can to help them learn. This teaching is unavoidably fraught with danger, e.g., the common extremely messy circumstance of spiritual gurus having sex with their disciples. And that is only one of the more extreme challenging situations; there are many others involved when trying to help others learn about spiritual sexuality. Discerning the difference between sex that is spiritual and sex that is profane, far from being pointless, as you suggest, is an excellent place to start, at least for adults. Not all sex is equal. This must be obvious to anyone who has been sexually used, manipulated, or abused. And even in relatively high functioning relationships, there is quick sex, sex to release tension, sex to escape frustration, sex as an expression of power, etc., while on the other hand there is Tantric and Taoist sacred sex. This surely is a difference that makes a difference, a difference that matters. In fact it is of the utmost urgency, for sex education to emerge from the dark ages, where only the plumbing is taught (this is a penis, this is a vagina, etc.) to include the emotional aspects (heart connection, affection, love), the energetic aspects (what is sexual energy, how to cultivate and circulate that energy) and the spiritual (how does sex affect one’s consciousness and one’s soul?) aspects of this most vital of all human functions. I see no inherent reason why all of this, in fact why any of this, must be as painful as you seem to assume it will be. Most of the pain and suffering associated with sexuality is because of the severe repression and denial of sexuality, not because of an honest, intelligent, exploration of learning. I am in complete agreement with you about the need to overcome this repression and stop perpetrating it upon this or future generations, but I see no reason to frighten people by insisting this learning journey must be filled with pain and suffering, although in some instances that could be the case, particularly when there is a history of sexual abuse and violence. Regarding your point about when sexual meditations become useful, I fail to understand your insistence that one must first do some other unspecified spiritual work before one can engage in sex as a meditation. We have been teaching couples for over 12 years now, and our approach is to start with sex as a meditation, not suggest that some years later they may be ready for that. What seems to work with almost everyone we have worked with, is to simply model what couples that have created successful, happy relationships, actually do. We do not insist on finding out what problems couples have, then try to “treat” or “fix” those problems, we simply share with people what works, let them know that we have been practicing these things for the past 25 years, that we have shared these methods with hundreds of other couples, for whom these practices also work, and to communicate that it is ok, nay, highly desirable for couples to try these things. They don’t have to wait until they are more prepared, until they are healed, until they are spiritually more advanced; they don’t have to be good people, they don’t have to be special people, they don’t have to deserve anything, and they don’t need anyone else’s permission to do these things, and certainly need no one else’s permission to be happy and to be sexually fulfilled. As people start to do what other couples have successfully done, as they learn how to create love (as opposed to fall in love – including the knowledge and skill of a mature adult spiritual sexuality), they start to heal, they start to regain their wholeness, their courage, their optimism, their faith, their motivation, their happiness, their lightness of being. Joining with, merging ecstatically with another human being, is the start of overcoming the ego illusion of separation, and their spirit naturally, organically awakens. This is a very good thing! This is the re-uniting of heaven and earth, of sex and spirit. You say: “I think it is OK to use the lie ‘Tantra is transcendence through bliss. Full body orgasms lead to enlightenment’ as a marketing ploy, an encouragement.” Actually Tantra is transcendence through bliss, or it can be; it certainly has been for Pala and I, and many others we have taught. Of course that is not all Tantra is. As for full body orgasms leading to enlightenment, it is certainly a fact that enlightened states of consciousness, are, among other things, very high energy states. Learning to cultivate and work intentionally and with awareness with that hot sexual energy to accumulate a high sexual life force charge and then to know what to do with it, has been an essential precondition for my own enlightened states, and I believe could be as important for others as well; certainly worth exploring. This is not even a little bit of marketing ploy for Pala and I, although I could understand that it might be for some teachers. I’m interpreting what you say to strongly imply that exploration of sacred sexuality is extremely difficult, and painful, but that need not be the case, not at all. We have found that most ordinary couples, and the exceptions are quite rare, are quite capable of grasping the significant of this different approach to sex, sexuality, lovemaking, relationship building, and spiritual practice, and also quite capable of implementing many practices into their lives within the short span of one weekend. Furthermore, couples notice significant positive changes in their relationships and in their lives, also in a single weekend, and these changes typically continue to deepen and expand. We have certainly saved many a marriage. The practices we teach are not extremely difficult, are not dangerous, and are not painful. Yet they remain powerful in their capacity to help couples transform their lives for the better. The practices we teach are as simple as growing hair on your arm. You don’t really have to learn some difficult process, don’t have to experience anguish, don’t have to be a special kind of person with special talents and abilities. Rather, you simply have to embrace change and have a desire to move forward to make your relationship a secure platform for creating love and happiness for a lifetime together. Furthermore, you don’t even have to search for the spiritual nuggets in the teaching and the practices. Just do them, and the great spirit will surely find you. You say: “The next stage of the work, the practice of sexual meditations, is rarely useful or fruitful if it is just a matter of playing with learned/borrowed techniques. A teacher of significant experience in this area is required. Such a teacher requires guidance/support from their teacher, who in turn needs to have completed their own path. Hence, they are rare.” This is an example of what I mean when I say you make it sound extremely difficult for a couple to follow a sacred sex spiritual path. In fact, we (Al Link and Pala Copeland) are self taught lovers. We have never had a guru, although we have had many excellent teachers from whom we have learned a great deal. I would suggest that a guru is not required, although one could be very helpful if you could find one, or if one would find you. Instead of worrying about how rare teachers and gurus might be, just take the next step, then the next, and surely you will eventually arrive at your destination. What is the final destination? Enlightenment of course, and it is for everyone, not just a special few, because enlightenment is not a destination, it is what you, and everyone else, actually are, which you can verify with your own personal experience of illumination. And sacred sexual practices, Tantric and Taoist, will definitely help you get there sooner rather than later. A personal record of enlightenment is available at Sexy Spiritual Relationships membership. More information about Tantra Retreats hosted by Al Link and Pala Copeland is available at 4 Freedoms Relationship Tantra.


: Thanks for continuing the discussion, Al and Paula – it looks like we are throwing good sweets. May it benefit our readers. I start somewhere in the middle.. " This is an example of what I mean when I say you make it sound extremely difficult for a couple to follow a sacred sex spiritual path" In an earlier paragraph, I specify: Breaking taboos, removing repression, honestly addressing your eroticism. And doing that.. in practice, not theory, is the painful bit. If it doesn't confront/crack/shake you to your very core, it wasn't a taboo you broke. If you haven't felt and passed through the fullness of your jealousy, fear of comparison and craving/need for the beloved, you haven't really tackled your repression. If you haven't followed your eroticism where it leads, honestly and willingly exploring what you find hot, no matter how profane, weird or strange that might look, then eroticism has not been addressed. All that is intensely delicious, but all of it is also unavoidably very painful work. Pain not in the sense of nerve stimulation. Pain as in suffering through and transcending the mind's limitations and fears. For example, when someone watches their beloved having a great porno session with someone else, they are likely to have to go through some hurt before they can appreciate and enjoy that love is happening. Childhood shames, abuses and hurts are very involved in eroticism. It is not unusual (if one is deep, aware, and sufficiently honest) to be eroticised at some level to e.g. humiliation. To honestly accept and move through that, without avoidance takes true grit and a capacity to be aware and present in emotionally painful experiences. Learning to really experience and enjoy the yummies, improving the intimacy in a relationship and so on is good healing work. Intimacy coaching, sexology and so on. Even without getting into the uncomfortable depths, this level of work can lead to good, natural sex, which always provides a glimpse of the divine possibility. Good, natural unrepressed sex evokes satori. Flash-in-the darkness truth. Enlightened states. Temporary, though memorable and often life changing. Satori is a glimpse out of a window, not a walk in the countryside. I have written more about the difference between satori and enlightenment here, for the interested. The experience of "enlightenment", more correctly "awakening to the path" is of course valuable, and there is no tantra without it. It is the experiencing of enlightened states that can give the internal unity of purpose and the determination required. That satori is the end goal of most of what is called tantra. It is also the goal of most of Osho's teachings on Tantra, although he did hint at what lies beyond. I have great gratitude for those that help others to this point. Their work is very valuable indeed, for tantra, and for human evolution. Although I sound argumentative, nitpicky and generally wigged out, I have great appreciation for you and the other teachers that help people get to that awakening. For many seekers, it is, as you say, just unavoidable and necessary work. Indeed, what the west has been given in teachings from Tantric and Taoist traditions is extremely valuable. Yes, they may well arrive eventually at their destination. Tantrikas, though, are not just any seekers. Perhaps a fifth of those that attain a natural, unrepressed, taboo free sexuality have the capacity for Tantra as such. Perhaps a fifth of them have the insistence that "eventually" is no good. The traditional bumper sticker (if trad tantrikas had had bumper stickers) reads "Enlightenment, this lifetime, or bust." A very different phonemenon from the "seeker" who wants a mercedes in the garage, a tantrika in the bedroom and other lifestyle conveniences. What I call Tantra starts after awakening to the path and after having cleared oneself of one's sexual psychopathology. It absolutely requires personal, sexual, intimate guidance. The secrets of Tantra can only be taught experientially. This guidance is absolutely impossible if the guide/guru has any agenda of personal need, any trace of addiction to pleasure, or any eroticism at all. It is just a fact that teachers at this level are rare. For the last few hundred years, they have (with the possible exception of Barry Long) been very secretive and very, very selective. My work for the last several years has been to make this level of teaching more available, more accessible. The women I have been working with the last several years, who are now the teachers in this school have the capacity to teach in this way. Their students are guided through the preliminary (taboo, eroticism, repression) work, and introduced to the "direct, secret teachings" as and when they show the capacity for it. They have been the most wonderful students. Women of unusual capacity, strength, insistence and persistence. Seekers with a passion and devotion to truth that is extremely rare. Dakinis don't contract to provide any sexual experience, or any particular outcome for their sessions. Nobody gets to buy sex. Nonetheless, extremely erotic stuff and sex (by the Bill Clinton definition) happens in many sessions. The Dakini contracts to support her student's awakening and flowering as far as it can go, without any limitation. Dakinis don't have limitations of any sort on what can or can't happen in their sessions. There is also no question at all as to who is in charge of the process. A student is most definitely not ordering from a menu! There are boundaries … the student's boundaries and current capacity. There are tests of sincerity, hurdles put before some students. For example, if someone's body has terrible circulation and not much nerve-response, a specified period of study with a teacher of yoga or martial arts may be prescribed. Further sessions then cannot be booked until the requisite work has been done. Sessions with a couple are ideally about helping them to work together through the taboo/erotic/repression curriculum. With some couples, their relationship patterns and codependencies are so entrenched that it is better for them to work individually, at least at first. Tantra is the fastest of paths, and is only for the most insistent of seekers because it never avoids. The necessary approach to difficult/confronting/exposing/shameful things is always "The way through a thing is THROUGH it." I followed the link to your site, and I think it's a perfectly good place for seekers and those just wanting a better connection with their partners. The work you do will for sure make a difference in many lives, and supports the rekindling of tantric practice and understanding. And, sure, there is a language problem. Tantra, to us tantrikas has a very specific meaning. We would prefer that the range of what is called Tantra in the West was called "lessons from tantra" or "sex and intimacy coaching". A couple that are great friends of the school run groups they brand as "TrueSex". Like that. It would save us having to look all snooty, calling what we do "real Tantra" or "authentic Tantra", which is necessary, but nasty. For sure, we don't mean that other teachings and teachers aren't real or authentic! Those teachings derived from tantric and taoist understandings and practices are plenty real, genuine and authentic! … Just, how else to distinguish, when the word "tantra" as used, often just means "with incense and candles". I try to strike a hopefully not insulting balance by calling what happens here "full path" or "complete path" tantra. Not perfect, but what else to do! The tricky thing for me is that I value your teaching, and other teachers, like friend Baba Dez of Sedona, the Muirs, even the misplaced snootiness of Mumford. All of you are doing magnificent and necessary work that probably couldn't happen without all the shopping opportunities and TM'ing. Nonetheless, in trying to describe the miracle that has happened here, halfway to India, I am going to be heard as critical. At least, I hope, not as critical as I am of teachers like Mr Tolle that imply that no work, no effort and no attention to one's sexual development is required. Even if that is paradoxically true, I insist that the other side of the paradox can't be ignored. Here's a link you may enjoy, where I do get a bit (lovingly) critical of those satsang wallahs.


: Hello Rahasya, I love your spiritual intelligence, your use of the language, and your acutely accurate articulation of concepts. And it is always such a pleasure to meet others who speak essentially the same language, who have had similar personal spiritual experiences, and have read some of the same books. You say: “And doing that.. in practice, not theory, is the painful bit. If it doesn't confront/crack/shake you to your very core, it wasn't a taboo you broke. If you haven't felt and passed through the fullness of your jealousy, fear of comparison and craving/need for the beloved, you haven't really tackled your repression. If you haven't followed your eroticism where it leads, honestly and willingly exploring what you find hot, no matter how profane, weird or strange that might look, then eroticism has not been addressed. All that is intensely delicious, but all of it is also unavoidably very painful work. Pain not in the sense of nerve stimulation. Pain as in suffering through and transcending the mind's limitations and fears.” I’m sure your teaching approach can work, indeed does work, for many, and as you have also alluded to, teachers draw the students that are right for them, just as students are attracted to the teachers who are right for them. However, I can’t help but notice a very similar approach you are taking with your spiritual teaching as Allopathic doctors take with treating illness, i.e., focus on the problem, focus on the disease (dis-ease) and then try to fix it. In effect this makes the problem or the disease the center of attention, more important than the person, much like when the physician making rounds refers to “the gall bladder” in room 407. We on the other hand, focus on what COUPLES (we work mainly with couples, not singles) who do love each other actually do to create, sustain and nurture that love, stay connected, keep passion hot, honor commitment, staying tuned to trust, respect, caring attention, loving kindness, sacred sexual practices, spiritual practices, caring for and honoring the body, getting proper sleep and rest, eating well, using nutritional supplements intelligently, getting regular exercise, etc. In this approach what matters, the entire focus of attention is on the persons, their relationship, relationship happiness, sexual fulfillment, physical, emotional, energetic and spiritual connection, and awakening all the way to Enlightenment for Two (what we call our unique spiritual practice for couples). To find out more about that visit our membership website: Sexy Spiritual Relationships. An image I like to use for how the healing and spiritual quickening happens as lovers undertake these healthy “best practices” for sacred sexuality, relationship happiness and spiritual growth, is that if you hold something in each hand, with something in one hand that is very light weight (e.g., a pencil), and in the other hand something that is heavy (e.g., a large rock), then turn your hands over so your closed fist is towards the earth, and open your hands, you will notice that both objects drop away with equal ease, relatively painlessly, almost without effort. This is a good metaphor for how it can be regarding even the most difficult issues affecting people’s lives, the issues associated with the most pain and suffering, issues which are seemingly impossible to resolve, issues that have persisted possibly for decades (or even carried forward from a previous life – STICKY KARMA). The emergence of energetic healing modalities across the planet has shown this to be possible for almost every issue or life circumstance, certainly including sexuality issues and spirituality blocks; modalities such as Tapping (Emotional Freedom Technique - EFT), Ho'oponopono, grounding, etc.; there are hundreds of them. The results they deliver can be and typically are very fast, sometimes almost instantaneous. People simply stop doing the dysfunctional things and start doing what works. This is not magic, and certainly not wishful thinking; it is real, and repeatable with large numbers of ordinary human beings in every walk of life, regardless of gender, age, race, socioeconomic status, etc. These methods transcend the limitations of lifelong conditioning, limiting beliefs, lifetime accumulations of pain and hurt, and do not require years of study, practice, pain and suffering, nor do they require the constant presence of a teacher or guru. Mostly all that is required is the courage to look for change, a willingness to try new things, and then some persistent effort over weeks, months, and perhaps years, to develop skill, integrate new knowledge, unlearn some bad habits, resistance to some bad behaviors, and saying yes to having what you do want instead of settling for what you don’t want. You also say: “For example, when someone watches their beloved having a great porno session with someone else, they are likely to have to go through some hurt before they can appreciate and enjoy that love is happening.” Do I detect an oxymoron here? I suppose it is possible for “a great porno session” and “love” to go together, but why bother? People have no idea what is possible in and what a long-term committed monogamous relationship has to offer. There need be nothing in such a relationship that is a prison, a trap, an unacceptable inconvenience, a denial of freedom, a repression of true desires, or limitation of any kind that really matters. But the gifts such a relationship can deliver are simply unbelievable for anyone who has never experienced such a relationship. But very few have any role models for such relationships that are at not only filled with hot passion but are also stable, where the couple are at once passionate lovers, best friends, parents, grandparents, and also allowing each to be free creative individuals. With Pala and me, our commitment of fidelity is never a burden, never a sacrifice, never an inconvenience, never something we merely put up with because we are afraid, or because it is the “right” thing to do, or because it is the “moral” thing to do, never because we have to do it. Our commitment of fidelity is a gift we give each other as an expression of our love for each other, our way of honoring each other. Our fidelity is a part of the very structure of a relationship that fulfills, nurtures, and enriches our lives; that provides a secure platform from which we can navigate through the perilous rapids of life’s fast flowing waters. Our fidelity is an important part of the structure of our relationship in which we define our lives in these physical bodies; it is one aspect of how we create a life together, including a love that will thrive for a lifetime together. You say: “Learning to really experience and enjoy the yummies, improving the intimacy in a relationship and so on is good healing work. Intimacy coaching, sexology and so on. Even without getting into the uncomfortable depths, this level of work can lead to good, natural sex, which always provides a glimpse of the divine possibility. Good, natural unrepressed sex evokes satori. Flash-in-the darkness truth. Enlightened states. Temporary, though memorable and often life changing. Satori is a glimpse out of a window, not a walk in the countryside. I have written more about the difference between satori and enlightenment here, for the interested. The experience of ‘enlightenment’, more correctly ‘awakening to the path’ is of course valuable, and there is no tantra without it. It is the experiencing of enlightened states that can give the internal unity of purpose and the determination required.” Are you suggesting that the only way to lasting, stable, full enlightenment (as opposed to a satori flash, an enlightened state that dissolves without becoming stable, is with sex involving multiple partners, or group sex? I assume that is not what you are saying, but it is implied, and could easily be interpreted to be what you mean. Are you suggesting that only by confronting the many neuroses and dysfunctional patterns at the evocation of great pain and suffering, is the only way to stable enlightenment? I do believe you are saying that, but as already expressed, believe there is another path, a path of pleasure, a path of love, a path of voluntary learning and change, a path of mastering hot sexual energy and using it consciously for the purpose of awakening. I could never deny that a path of pain and suffering could lead to full enlightenment, but no one has ever convincingly made the case that a path of pain and suffering is the necessary spiritual path. As for the “internal unity of purpose and the determination required” I have always found, and believe this to be almost a universal principle of how human beings learn and change, is that having a VISION of WHAT YOU DO WANT is the most productive growth strategy; not focusing on what you do not want, e.g., the disease. I believe the way that the brain and central nervous system, and yes our consciousness, works, is that we get more of what we pay attention to, and by paying attention to our problems we do not get rid of them, we simply get more of the same. You say: “Tantrikas, though, are not just any seekers. Perhaps a fifth of those that attain a natural, unrepressed, taboo free sexuality have the capacity for Tantra as such.” This of course begs the question of what a “natural, unrepressed, taboo free sexuality” is. I daresay that for most readers, that will instantly translate into some variation of “lots of sex with lots of people” and possibly “lots of people at the same time.” But I would deny that as the primary meaning and assert it is certainly not the only interpretation. A healthy, mature, adult, spiritual sexuality is very discriminating. One variation of such sexuality is monogamy and fidelity, honoring a commitment to one other human being. I could not deny it might (for some people) also include multiple partners, even many at the same time, but do seriously doubt if such scenarios are really “natural” or “free,” and particularly would question if they could typically be spiritual and loving (although of course they could be, but that would I believe be rare, possibly limited to people already in the enlightened state). I don’t buy for a minute that the vast majority of the world’s population, everywhere on the planet, throughout history, pairing up with one other person is some kind of spiritual error. The empowerment that brings to the couple, the cocoon of safety that provides from which to accept all of life’s challenges, the profound enrichment of the individual person that unleashes, the happiness that can be generated, the building and sustaining of families through countless generations that sustains, the pleasure it brings into the lives of the lovers, the creativity is unlocks, the kindness, generosity and compassion it generates, etc. are undeniable and predictable. The primary reason so many marriages (or other couple relationships) fail is from lack of knowledge and skill, but that is relatively easy to learn if as a society we would put in even a fraction of the effort we use to help people learn how to read and write. You say: “What I call Tantra starts after awakening to the path and after having cleared oneself of one's sexual psychopathology. It absolutely requires personal, sexual, intimate guidance. The secrets of Tantra can only be taught experientially. This guidance is absolutely impossible if the guide/guru has any agenda of personal need, any trace of addiction to pleasure, or any eroticism at all. It is just a fact that teachers at this level are rare. For the last few hundred years, they have (with the possible exception of Barry Long) been very secretive and very, very selective.” I guess we will agree to disagree (and I don’t think you are being argumentative and hope you don’t find me to be either) about what “real” Tantra is. It pretty much sounds like you are saying that Tantra is already being enlightened, but I believe it to be a spiritual path, and on the ego illusion side of reality, that must mean, an incremental step by step moving toward the light, not just what you do after you are already enlightened. I will certainly continue to call what we do Tantra, not neo-Tantra, but Tantra, and I guess that will offend some people, but so be it. I don’t understand when you say: “This guidance is absolutely impossible if the guide/guru has…any eroticism at all.” Eroticism is just a form of energy, not good or bad, not to be denied or repressed, but simply enjoyed and harnessed, used for spiritual purposes. There need be no attachment, clinging, neediness, hedonism, etc. involved in eroticism. It is part of the structure of the cosmos, important, necessary, sublime and divine. Denying eroticism would be a denial of an essence that is part of being human in a body. I can’t see how denying (even transcending, whatever that might be in this case) eroticism could be helpful to anyone. Of course you could ignore eroticism if that simply did not matter to you (if that were really the honest truth for you), but that would be a choice akin to not watching hockey. It would certainly carry no virtue in making that decision, and in my opinion would have no obvious moral or spiritual value (and I doubt any subtle moral or spiritual value either). Your school sounds wonderful, and the people who work with you also seem to be excellent sacred sexuality guides and spiritual teachers. I applaud your important work. I would be curious if you work primarily with singles or if you also get a lot of couples, what the proportions would be? My sense of this would be that the approach you take would be more suited to singles and more successful with them, but I am sure you have also worked very productively with many couples. Nevertheless, I remain a bit skeptical. I have this image of a couple coming to your teaching and being instructed that each has to have sex with someone else while their partner watches, then when this brings up their “stuff” there would be some other methods by which you would help them heal and get comfortable watching their partner have sex with someone else, and that would be the proof that they are healed. Frankly, I would not take any pleasure in watching Pala have sex with another person, and that is not because I have some spiritual block, some conditioned neurosis, some wound that requires healing, some lingering jealousy, some power based need to possess and control her; it simply means that we have a committed monogamous relationship and one of the ways we express that love is sex only with each other. We love other people in all sorts of intimate ways, but sex is just between the two of us. It is not a spiritual defect requiring fixing having a relationship like that, so I guess that just means we would never select you as a teacher! :o) However, I do not doubt that for many, monogamy, fidelity, commitment is a kind of prison that they long to escape, and you could help them do so. But is seems to me that it is equally plausible to interpret the avoidance of commitment, the unwillingness to honor another human being with the exclusivity or your sexual expression as a significant part of the spiritual problem! What a delightful dialog this is and I do hope we can continue and that other members of this discussion topic join in with their comments, and/or questions. All good things, Al Link

Thanks Al … and, sure, it is useful to me, this feedback and discussion. Especially your pointing out what people could misunderstand from my expression. Indeed, many teachers are needed to reach seekers in various areas and distances. The range where your teaching and ours are useful have significant overlap, also significantly different areas of reach, accessibility. Our approach to couples work is perhaps the most obvious. Yours looks to me much related to much of the tantra groups, workshops and intensives that I took with my then-wife. This work was gorgeous, useful. Probably 95% of my path was addressed while being monogamous for 14 years with Pashianti (.net), who teaches closer to you, eg. her last group was called "Tantric Relating". We often recommend your genre of group work to students. We also appreciate students with a good base of such awareness work. Where we do not overlap is in being of use to most people. Your work is (obviously my assumptions here) accessible to a far wider range of people. People with an urge to improve, enhance their relationships, an urge to discover deeper levels of intimacy. A lot of people can benefit from the work you, my ex wife, the Osho Multiversity, Margot Anand's teachers and many other excellent teachers do. We do have students that arrive with a "problem" eg PE, ED or a feeling that tantric work could be helpful to their marriage. We do work with them, and their troubles tend to ease, but our involvement is unlikely to go beyond two sessions, or a "level 1" group. Some of them though, turn out to be what we call "seekers with intent". What we see as our "niche". We work with individuals. When we work with a couple, we work with each of them to their own benefit. We have no agenda about how their relationship should look. My example of what a couple exploring tantra could face was more about indicating the intensities of emotion, the capacity required of the students we work deeply with. Not so much a literal description, more a "scary statement" that is honest in it's scariness. When a couple are committed to their relationship and have the capacity, the potential to be useful to each other, I usually recommend that they intensify that experience. Take their relating to as deep an intimacy, as total a relating as they can manage. This may seem paradoxically "supportive" of monogamy, but we don't see any relationship structure or sexual lifestyle choice as an obstacle or a problem. We regard wherever the student is as the right place to pursue deeper awareness. There was, after all, one Tantric Master who's attainment followed a long period (3 years or so, I think) sharing a single robe with a woman. Totality is the key, not any particular model of relating. One Dakini of this school has mentioned an interest in doing a weekend retreat for couples, based on that method. Perhaps it will happen… The core emphasis of my work is supporting teachers to their flowering. Very particular teachers, a niche that perhaps doesn't have much overlap in your teaching. Dakinis of this school teach in all sorts of ways, but have one modality in common. They teach students directly, intimately, lovingly in individual (and couples) sessions. They have no boundary or restriction. This can sound like "no safety" and "no support" because our culture raises children with strong boundaries, thinking this equates to strong support. Dakinis hold an absolutely loving space, immaculately supportive. Just not supportive of the ego, or bounded/restricted in any way. There are boundaries … the student's boundaries, which we respect and encourage them to be conscious with. For sure, our Tantra is not for everyone. Not even (beyond a level2 group or so) for most seekers. This school is primarily for those of great intent, and an insistence on maximum possible speed. As per the historic intent of traditional Tantra. So, for sure we appreciate your work, the reach it has, the scale (way larger than ours) where you make a difference to awareness. We are here for the bezerkers, the seriously intent, the absolutely insistent, the totally committed. Like in an English breakfast, the chicken is involved, but the pig is committed… I emphasise speed, the consequent emotional roughness of the ride, and other "negative" aspects of the path not by way of saying that we use rough or crude methods. Just, working with teachers of this school, there is a catalysis that happens, a direct transmission of enhanced awareness. The resulting speed, pace of realisation and increase of awareness is for sure uncomfortable. On account of that factor, we are very deliberate with teaching the most powerful methods we know for handling the feelings that arise – swiftly, thoroughly and effectively. In the West, tantra is commonly regarded as a way to benefit from sexy stuff, intimacy work, sexual healing, deeper loving, experiences of bliss. All great agendas. Good work of benefit to many. Commonly perceived as cults of ecstasy, bliss bunnies and oriental-flavour therapy. In the East, Tantra was (and maybe in Kashmir still is) the most rapid, insistent and potentially dangerous spiritual approach. Useful to a self-selected minority. Requiring personal guidance. The common view is often that a tantrika is a very dangerous magician or someone risking himself insanely for uncertain ends. Tantric understanding and practice continues to spread to the West. This school, located where it is, does things more on the Eastern than the Western agenda. The other point of difference I see, just consequential to the rest, is our regard for different levels of sexuality. You suggest that sexuality is important, and can't be ignored as a spiritual approach. Also that there is an intrnsic difference between porno/fantasy based sex and spiritually intentioned sex. Our view is that all and any form of sex, taken with awareness, is spiritual in intent, however that may look. A Dakini is just as likely to reenact a scene of childhood abuse with a client as to introduce him to sex as meditation. Whatever his awareness requires … no divide of profaneporno//spiritual/transcendent … just that it be explored with unflinching awareness. And, of course, I would be nervous, even alarmed, if I heard of someone teaching in that way. I know what it takes in guidance, in support. What it challenges in the ego, the intensity and allure of temptations. I have no reasons to offer why anyone should trust me or the Dakinis with this kind of work, except for the fact of it happening successfully. Of course, someone would have to spend some time with us to have a chance of discerning that! From my perspective, it would be right, organically correct, for you to "warn" your students of our approach. They should appreciate the safety, intelligence and accessibility of your teaching. Most of them should enjoy the benefits, and not hassle themselves with ideas as extreme, as fringe, as ours. Of course, there may be a few that might hear that warning, and find it intrigues them …

Hello Rahasya, Excellent! I believe I “see” now where you are coming from. I certainly would not hesitate to recommend your work, teaching, school, and associate Tantra teachers to anyone looking for that type of path, and who could make their way to South Africa! Just a note to other readers on this topic, the link supplied in your post does not work. You said: “The core emphasis of my work is supporting teachers to their flowering. Very particular teachers…” The information at that link is quite important and I would recommend participants in this forum topic check it out. The link is working correctly now. All good things, Al Link

: Thanks for getting the link working, Al … and for sure, to understand our intent is no easy thing. The willingness and effort of inquiring a bit is very appreciated. A Dakini popped by, read the conversation, and thoroughly enjoyed. A student of hers is currently visiting Canada. Not sure of his itinerary, but will suggest he looks you up.

Thanks to Al Link for engaging in this discussion. Al and Pala Copland are based in Canada and hold retreats and workshops in beautiful places.
Their website: SexySpiritualRelationships.com

Bullshit detectors, Emperor's new clothes and training wheels

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:17:00 +0000

I have heard…

Once is happenstance.
Twice is coincidence.
Three times is enemy action.

For the longest time, I did not realise that the "family sayings" I was raised on were mostly military in origin. Churchill to Atilla. Hitler to Gandhi. I suppose if I had continued that cultural deformity, it would have been Regan to Thatcher … No. Not me. I overcame my father's ways and raised my children in mental freedom. From me, they got the best bits of Sun Tzu, Miamoto, Bruce Lee, Morihei Ueshiba and Kurosawa's finest movie.

Parental evolution aside, and my ways long ago demilitarised, an old habit of paying attention the third time I hear something persists.

Three women recently, perhaps four … more or less doing what men call complaining, ranting and so on – what women call expressing themselves – what Dakas and Tantrikas call the fierce, fiery Dakini – what Dakinis call … well, you get the idea.

All on the same topic, more or less. That is why I notice it as three times.

The topic is their annoyance (not really the right word, but it will suffice) with Neo, or American Tantra.

When I see something in this school happen three times, it is probably something that is spreading.

A bit of google and facebook later, I saw other sources of similar annoyance.

So, I wish to try and explain what is happening. Call it a belated preemptive apology to those who will be scared, annoyed or justifiably righteous about tantrikas getting into tantra-bashing.

Osho's Neo Tantra was the root of most of what is now known as tantra in the West. The few tantrikas that distanced themselves from Osho's approach, stressing that they did not teach neo-tantra mostly used their own adaptations and remained relevant, or confused Oriental hygeine, exercise, mind training and diet with Tantra and became curiosities.

Neo Tantra, in the Osho community, is mostly still about clearing the effects of Western repression. Good work for any seeker of worthwhile intent. From this base of technique, Western teachers played mix-and-match, adapted and selected with various agendas. Polyamorists, sensualists, couples, fetishists, bdsm afictionados and sexual healers, pagans, wiccans, magicians, discordians, speed seduction trainers and many others incorporated lessons and techniques from neo-tantra in their practice. The marketplace tested their accessibility, and some thrived.

For new seekers, this is a wonderful phenomenon. Never before have tantric teachings been so accessible. Better still, many teachers are mature in their techniques, and often have a significant range.

It is seekers that have already taken their first steps and are faced with many first-step teachers that have a rougher time of it. For a while, a tantrika will enjoy the range of teachings available, but will want the depths. Seeking out teachers that may have something further, something deeper than relationship therapy, better fucking and so on will work for a while, but will eventually take them into areas where a good bullshit detector and an immunity to Emperor's New Clothes are unwelcome.

It could look unfortunate that many teachers are making their lessons their lifestyles, but it serves existence and the increase of awareness hugely. When the only tool you have is a hammer, all problems start to look like a nail, true … but, you do get very good at hammering. Techniques are training wheels. When you get the knack, understanding or ability the technique teaches, it is not personally useful to you to continue the technique. Making the technique the center of your life, interpolating and experimenting on ways to make it more effective and so on is not really useful to the teacher, but it makes the teacher very good at what they do. Very useful to many in their specialisation.

What were once spiritual expressions have become marketing slogans. What were once secret teachings, passed on with careful explanation in exquisite timing are now catch-phrases and sound-bytes. These things still have a taste, a flavour of the truths they represent. That flavour is very alluring to seekers. Disillusion follows.

Some take offense. Some feel cheated when they find that bliss means more and better orgasms, not the magical synthesis of love and hate. Some are disappointed to find enlightenment means learning enough EQ to not trigger their lover's lover's jealousy, and to set clear boundaries so they do not get triggered themselves.

The ones who get the most offended, the ones I most want to calm by pointing out the great usefulness of this huge availability are the ones who know something deeper. I want to convince them (maybe you) of taking a little care, not to throw the baby out with the bathwater, so to speak.

Beloveds, the offense in you is strong, real and appropriate. Stay with the feeling of it, which probably manifests as an urge to dispense truth with some intensity. The intensity is the need for what you know to be communicated. Possibly at the moment, it seems more that the intensity is an objection to something. Feel your objection deeply, and use it to purge yourself of any nonsense you may have bought into along with your first steps.

And then, without scaring beginners more than necessary, beloveds, help those that need to see what you can show them.

Tantric missionaries

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:32:00 +0000

In the Western world, Ideas and practices of value are most effectively spread as products. Things, experiences and information that can be sold. Tantra has grown into a business sector, which has given it it's now significant reach.

For a teaching to be successful in business terms, it has to gain and maintain wide appeal. It has to present itself in a way that makes it as interesting as possible to as many as possible. This has made a lot of really good beginner work available. Even a lot of teacher training, which has expanded the business sector and made initiatory and introductory practices widely available.

The Tantra school that has happened here, halfway between East and West, exists to make the true depths of Tantra available to Western seekers. To manage that, the core work of the school had to be the development and support of women who could become Dakinis.

I have written a bit more about the sexism in this school and the necessity of Dakinis to authentic Tantra at the school's weblog.

So now, it is time to make the teachings that Dakinis have developed available to seekers who suspect that Tantra has depths beyond ejaculatory continence, bigger orgasms and blissful states. Dakinis of this school have now made a few trips to introduce our teaching to the Western world.

Currently, Dakini Shakti is teaching in Portland, Ashland and hopefully in San Francisco too - in America till 14 July, and teaching all along the way before heading to Ireland, and then home. She updates her news at her blog and announces her events as they are arranged.

I have, of course, been following her travels with interest. The response to her teaching has been gratifying. Of course, some have been challenged and have felt threatened, but mostly, she has found a receptive and interested audience. Some have glimpsed her depths and have delighted by the possibilities she represents. Many have expressed gratitude.

Some will be coming to the International Sexuality and Consciousness conference in Cape Town this December. Here's a link to video of our presentations at last years conference.

This sexist school

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:24:00 +0000

Sometimes men try to book a tantra, lingam, sensual or similar massage with us. The Dakinis tend to say no.

Sometimes, women request something as specific. We tend to say yes.

This may appear genderist, even sexist, and it is. A core difference between our teaching of men and women is:

When teaching men, the Dakini guides the process, choosing which techniques to use, and when.

With women, I suggest which techniques and approaches to the work would currently suit them, and they choose.

The other male teachers in the school, the Dakas, do sessions mostly with women who are learning from a Dakini of the school, to the Dakini's direction.

This is because Tantra insists on the primacy of the feminine. What happens in sessions, therefore, always originates in a woman's decision.

Although Tantra, historically had to be "fronted" by male Gurus that the Patriarchy could respect, the women were never not in charge of the development of the arts. They were the sisters, grandmothers, lovers, wives and teachers of all the great gurus of history. They hid and revealed teachings in response to the cultural changes they perceived. They encouraged, or limited the audiences of gurus, depending on their areas of usefulness. They told the gurus where to travel, where to teach. They were responsible for "guru quality control", and no man could be regarded as being a tantric master or guru without their express endorsement.

Recently I was given a copy of Judith Simmer Brown's excellent book Dakini's Warm Breath which documents the function of the Dakini in ancient Tibet.

Tantra is and always has been a teaching guided by women. Even when the women have been secretive, even secret from themselves. A man has always had the possibility of finding the Dakinis he needs. After all, every woman has the kernel, the seed of the Dakini within her, and she does not have to be aware of it, or cooperative with it for the man to find it and benefit from what it catalyses in him.

Once upon a time, I was, as a teacher, just willing and available to teach the few women who went to the considerable trouble of seeking me out and asking for my initiation and teaching.

It was a Dakini who gathered the first group of people I spoke to and booked me on a flight to where they were.

Dakinis developed and started the teaching modality we call Tantra sessions, which, in terms of effectiveness and totality, far exceeds the usefulness of anything I had ever dreamed of on my own path.

Likewise, every increase of the availability of our teachings, our group work, retreats, the conferences we have participated in, the hours of video on youtube, our websites and the book I am nearly finished writing have all been inspired/directed/suggested by Dakinis.

Winston Churchill was once asked if he thought that, by the year 2000, women would be running the world. His wise reply: Yes. They will still be at it.

Patriarchs with insight see the truth and bemoan it. We celebrate the truth.

How the word is used: little t tantra and Big T Tantra

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Sun, 09 May 2010 03:31:00 +0000

Little "t" tantra, tantra in general, as it is widely understood describes sensually intensive massage with candles and incense, enhanced orgasms, a cure for PE and ED, visualisations of diagrams and symbols, systems of chanting, a genre of relationship and intimacy counseling and sex with candles and incense. It uses techniques from the Kama Sutra, temple dances, initiation rituals, sexology, psychotherapy, shamanism, NLP and speed seduction. Many things use the word. Many things are implied in it. Great and miserable books have been written about it. The sublime movie Bliss represents tantra, as does Myers' ridiculous movie, The Love Guru.

Big T Tantra has one purpose. Making yourself available, open enough, free enough from illusion, beliefs and attitudes for enlightenment, Samadhi to happen. It requires intensity, passion, courage and intelligence. Teachers use any and every technique, drawing from a huge range, even experimenting/channeling/discovering on the fly on the rare occasions that that is required. At least for part of the journey, some form of initiation is essential. Many techniques and approaches depend heavily on personal, direct teaching for their true lessons to be learned.

This school fits into both definitions. In the greater world of tantra, our practice of Tantra can be seen as complementary to some practices, a next step for others, and master classes at post graduate level for those who have come to the end of what is otherwise available. In the world of Tantra, we are pioneers who have evolved ways of making the true depths of Big T Tantra accessible to westerners.

Time for authentic Tantra, the complete-path teaching of Dakinis

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Tue, 04 May 2010 18:40:00 +0000

With delight I notice more and more tantra teaching happening in the world. The next generation of teachers are now teaching.

The pioneering and experimental work (how to teach tantra to people of the modern mindset?) of Osho, Margot Anand, Barry Long, John Mumford, and others has borne fruit.

These teachers and their group work facilitators developed an understanding of the modern cultural mindset and how to work with it.

Nowadays, all worthwhile teachers and schools have the objective of removing the culturally imposed/gathered eroticism and automatic assumptions about sex. Clearing the ground of the weeds, the false, before attempting to plant a garden.

This work is more or less essential for all seekers. At minimum, an awareness of one's erotic patterns is essential to any real progress on any path.

Mainly because they operated in a sexually aware and un-repressed culture, traditional ancient tantra did not bother much with this area of work. They practiced in pl;aces and times that were far less repressed. The erotic sculptures around the temple were the only test of readiness they needed. Until a prospective student could walk around the temple without being attracted or repelled by the explicitly erotic statues, he or she was not ready to enter the temple.

A generation of seekers have benefited from the preliminary outer temple work that has been all Westerners know of Tantra. Only now, teachers who continue their teaching into the deep mysteries of inner temple tantra are becoming available.

One characteristic teachers of authentic, real or traditional-equivalent tantra share is that they engage, directly, closely, intimately with their students. There is, obviously, no other way to teach the deep truths of sex-as-meditation.

Daniel Odier's novel, Tantric Quest gives a hint of this kind of work and what it means to be a Dakini's student. From my perspective, teachers at this level are needed now, and my life, for the last several years has been dedicated to enabling and encouraging a few special women to this work.

They can be found at the Teachers page of our international website, advaittantra.com

A busy Tantric year happening in Africa

noreply@blogger.com (Rahasya A) — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:13:00 +0000

Since the miraculous bloodless revolution and the dawning of the New South Africa, the Rainbow Nation, South African seekers have had a much easier time of things generally. The wonderful (at least on paper) new Constitution has removed much of the shadow of illegality that apartheid imposed on free thinkers and others of a non state-religion inclination. The country has eleven officially recognised languages and many South Africans speak more than half of these fluently.

Because of these factors, or possibly for no particular reason at all, South African seekers have a relatively easy time becoming trans-cultural – able to connect with and learn from many cultures without being owned by any of them, especially the one they were born into.

At any time, several teachers, students or friends of this school are in India, Sedona, Cologne or wherever there is teaching and/or learning to be done.

South Africa's seekers are in the main, sincere and strong in intent. Owing to the immense practicality required for life in South Africa (One has to respond to situations of all sorts as they are, not as they, according to rules, should be) seekers here tend to have pretty good bullshit filters, and are mostly immune to the Emperor’s New Clothes syndrome.

As many teachers of everything from Reiki to Rolphing can confirm, running groups, retreats and workshops with South Africans is a delight. The sincerity with which they engage and their commitment to action, once they are clear that you indeed have something worthwhile to teach, is deeply gratifying.

South Africa has several teachers in the area of sacred sexuality. Two of the most venerable have a lot of nervousness around publicity, but have been making a difference in many lives over the last fifteen or so years. Naturally, many of our students and some of our teachers have previously worked with one, or both of them.

There are a few sensual massage, loving touch, tantric and taoist massage practitioners. Although we of course, address these areas of sexuality, and use these techniques, we often refer people to these teachers when it is clear they need a significant immersion in that work.

Osho tantra groups happen here every year or so. A few years ago, the facilitator of these was a South African, living in Germany. The last was in November, facilitated by the lovely Halima.

South Africa also exports some teachers. Isaac Shapiro and Leslie Temple-Thursdon are probably the best known, and we love their work. Isaac's way of teaching the philosophy of Advaita is unique and effective. Leslie's mind-processing techniques are simple, and strong. Just what we like in technique.

At this school, the Dakas, Dakinis and Rahasya run a comprehensive programme of individual sessions work, short courses, workshops and retreats in and around Johannesburg, Cape Town, and gorgeous country venues.

In Johannesburg (Josi) in the province of Gauteng (yes, some do call us Gautangorangs when they have had a few too many brandies with cola) the teachers are Dakinis Wendy, Shekinah, Shima and Crystal (reverse alphabetical order, if you were wondering) and Dakas Stephen and Andrew..

Shima was our representative at the Sedona (Arizona) Dakini / Daka conference in 2009. Her impressions of American tantra found their way into a blog article. Currently, she is intent on getting to Sahara in time to film a dance festival and, of course, the famous temple sculptures. It was her camera, unfortunately often without its favourite camera man, that shot most of the footage at our youtube page.

In Cape Town, Director of the Cape School Dakini Shakti and Daka Stephen manage a very busy practice, and have a group, workshop or retreat planned for almost every weekend of 2010.

Gecko Creek in the Cedarberg has become a regular venue for retreats. Dakini Shakti and Daka Stephen will be running the next Introduction to Tantra retreat, which we classify as a level one experience.

At the Osho Oasis in the Knysna forest, Shakti and I present our intensive retreats, the level two Tantric Awareness and level three Tantric Practice retreats. These are probably our most intensive structured group work. Yes, there is a level four … but, as a rough guide, most final stage retreats and workshops, by most of even the big name tantra teachers we would call level one.

We are doing the two and the three on consecutive weekends in March 2010. It is advisable to do considerable work, not necessarily with us, before the two, and you have to have taken the two if you want to apply for the three. So far, around half of retreat participants take to the next level in a year or so. Some will be doing both of these retreats consecutively.

It is also advisable to book soon for this extraordinary work. Accommodation at the Osho Oasis is limited, even including tents.

The Osho Oasis is the perfect venue for intensive retreats. The most important single factor is that absolutely everyone on the property is well practiced in tantra and/or is strongly supportive of the work we do. Of course, we delight in the seclusion, the super-healthy vegetarian food, the wood fired showers, and even get along pretty well with the composting toilets.

Both these venues are quite rustic. Not to everyone's taste, although, of course the bush camp feel of the place is a delight in itself to most South Africans.

Dakini Wendy and I are planning two (2) level one retreats, in May and October 2010. (This levels thing may get confusing … perhaps we should find some other classification?). This Tantra Safari happens at the most gorgeous and luxurious venues: Mount Grace, Sabi Sabi, and the Cape Grace.

For seekers interested in Tantra, and especially for seekers who have had a good taste of the teachings available around the world, South Africa is, at the moment, a very, very special place to be indeed.

From http://advaittantra.com/satantra.html